>>7547301 (lb)
Those sleepers sure can be a problem; amirite?
>>7547301 (lb)
Those sleepers sure can be a problem; amirite?
/scans the room, looking for Q
/leans towards anon to whisper
In another year or so, they will go from "classics" to "oldies".
/spots Q
/ducks and runs while dodging objects anons are throwing
If Tom's read in, then he'll play games, too. Appear weak when strong. Besides, we all know Huber handed everything over to Durham.
He's signaling to the D's that are pushing this through as quickly as possible before Impeachment will "block" the Senate from other stuff they are working on:
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 90221d No.7535322 📁
Dec 17 2019 13:48:20 (EST)
The Senate must be unrestricted to conduct 'other' important business.
If [D]s knew Senate would not vote to convict - why proceed?
How long does a typical Senate impeachment trial take?
Can the Senate conduct 'other' business during this time?
No.
What 'value' might this have for [D]s?
Barr/Durham working in secret?
Senate working openly?
'Value' of public learning the truth prior to i_unseal?
Propaganda_push failing.
Transparency & Accountability is the only way forward to save the Republic.
This is not another 4-year election.
Game theory.
Q