Anonymous ID: dbad27 Dec. 22, 2019, 8:18 a.m. No.7589221   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7589210

>Postings last bread shook them up, call went out all shills on deck. PANIC!

Yup! Like the POTUS is protected like every other FEDERAL EMPLOYEE from retaliation!

Anonymous ID: dbad27 Dec. 22, 2019, 8:32 a.m. No.7589337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9363 >>9406

>>7589292

>So the top elected executive official, who controls what is classified, needs protection in a whistleblower act? meh…

NO

POTUS (no matter who is POTUS is a FEDERAL EMPLOYEE)

 

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES are protected against RETALIATION the name of the ACT doesn't matter (ACTUALLY AKA 'PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES' under 5 USC 2302)

 

5 USC 2302 falls under GENERAL PROVISIONS for FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

 

POTUS DIDN'T NEED TO FILE A 'WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT' TO BE PROTECTED BY THIS ACT. POTUS JUST NEEDS TO BE A FEDERAL EMPLOYEE WHICH HE IS