>>7760175 (\pb)
HAHA.
>>7760175 (\pb)
HAHA.
Shill. You keep pushing this garbage. You say, "it is OUR duty as citizens to READ the laws and treaties before they come to vote."
TRUE, BUT YOU DON'T GIVE LINKS TO THE ACTUAL USMCA TEXT. YOU ONLY PUSH YOUR NARRATIVE.
All anons should read it for themselves, as I have. Then they will know you are a shill.
I started writing it when you posted 1/3. I saw you pushing this a few breads ago, so I was ready to nip it in the bud.
I read the USMCA last month when a shill like you turned me into a concernfag. What I found was that the shills were not telling the truth about what the USMCA actually says.
Also, what was really eye-opening for me was that there was a clause which allows the USA to modify the agreement at a later date. When I found that, I really laughed. At that point, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE REST OF THE USMCA SAYS.
Just kill NAFTA, get this thing passed, and, if it doesn't work out, we can change it.
If you are sincere, stop being such a concernfag pushing that narrative before you know what you are talking about.
GO READ IT FIRST.