actually them pulling this weak move now of all times
is a very good sign.
they really don't have much at all if that's the best they can come up with
that's why the true archive keepers took time to include posts replied to.
the graphic maps often do/did
not sure, he was still spamposting, just not that pic
owners & intent aren't quite the same tho
> they have been dropping like flies
always have.
can't have those in the cult be on top if anyone can just succeed and live
>This is the same for EVERY post that Q replies to (even if it is on the previous thread)
how far in the chain?
also applicable when pertinent content is not in the post Q replied to but the post that post replied to (or further down)?
>added by the guy from Qmap.pub.
>It's not in the Q drop.
yeah
that's been a big problem with those titles
from day one
there are other threads, too, that changes the ratio/count
>almost a year old a year old site
any old site can be edited.
this is just a new old slide.
of course those who set it up are trying to build cred off Q.
they will fail as their previous attempts have.
just ask infowarts' ZAK about Q