>>7860913

Why would this be notable? You’re comparing EST to GMT. The GA post was at 23:24:46. Your cap is of the post is of it not fully loaded on the page.

>>7860965

Concur.

Baker/Note Taker

>>7860962

>>>7860913 Q timestamp's equaling 19,20,21 (dates)

This isn’t notable, it’s an EST and GMT comparison. Anything timestamp related is always EST only.

>>7861079

>>7861100

Understood, no problem.

>>7861111 Quads chek’d. Thanks for taking notes.

>>7861241 muh catalog keks. June/July 2018 iirc.

>>7861409

Definitely still here.

>>7861521 kek, for sure.

>>7861572 How is it notable? Find me a drop where Q said we should compare GMT and EST timestamps and then add the numbers together. Long ago established that only EST is used. And Q has never acknowledged any adding up of the digits in a TS.