Anonymous ID: 26994d Jan. 30, 2020, 6:06 a.m. No.7964163   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4169 >>4232 >>4285 >>4292

List of those "targeted" in POTUS' latest twat.

Comey, Slick Willie Clinton, Schitt, Pelosi, Clapper, Tony Podesta, Maxine Waters, Cryin' Chuck, Holder, John Podesta, DW Schultz, L Lynch, E Warren, Hildabeast Clinton, Obongo.

I suspect these will be those first served with indictments. They weren't pointed out for no reason, ladies and gents. Eyes on!

 

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1222853077574856706

Anonymous ID: 26994d Jan. 30, 2020, 6:08 a.m. No.7964174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4198

>>7964153

That is POTUS heading to a rally pre-election. Protesters had gathered blocking the entrance. Trump performed an end-around and made it anyway, fucking said protesters in the ass. It's a metaphor for what was to come. TRUMPED.

Anonymous ID: 26994d Jan. 30, 2020, 6:45 a.m. No.7964425   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4474

>>7964216

Fine, fine.

>Either the IG violated the law and released the name of the whistleblower or the whistleblower violated the law and leaked classified info.

Not either/or, could be both/and.

>releasing the whistleblower's name in the impeachment proceedings at this time predetermine's the whistleblower's guilt.

False. Those two things are not even related. Naming someone doesn't predetermine guilt at all.

>Having a Supreme Court Justice be the mouth piece to predetermine his guilt violates the whistleblower's due process rights beyond repair

No. The "sacred" secrecy of the whistleblower is ONLY covered w/in the intelligence community. Its being released to the public (however that happens) won't violate any protection acts. This fact nulls all further points below.

Anonymous ID: 26994d Jan. 30, 2020, 7:41 a.m. No.7964778   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7964744

As some others have done, you can take those signs they give you and rip it into the form of a Q. Seen that before.

OR bring a sharpie with you and write a big Q on the sign.

Anonymous ID: 26994d Jan. 30, 2020, 7:58 a.m. No.7964890   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7964874

>is just the concept of

Then you haven't done your research.

It's a DoD MIL project. Plenty of open source info on it. If you think it's just a "concept" there's a lot more to learn.