Looks more like a street in San Francisco.
Great find.
NOTABLE
Mark Zaid, attorney for whistleblower, a possible disinfo agent assigned to muck up JFK assassination research.
It's "opinion" that he was involved in JFK assassination research? That he tried to argue that Oswald wasn't an intelligence agent…you have a firsthand account of his antics from a well-known JFK researcher that points towards Zaid being a clown plant.
Not notable? WTF are you smoking?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardons_for_ex-Confederates
Asking for sauce on what should be known history…ffs
The article itself is bringing up controversy. Read it and comprehend…DiEugenio's point is how strange it was that this guy showed up and went against the entire grain of research, denying witness testimony and ignoring Oswald's clown connections…
…a discerning anon could easily note this looks like Zaid himself was running interference and points towards clown connections himself, but that's obviously not you.
…and since when do notables have to "prove" anything? Notables can be anything which encourages anons to dig, and Zaid is obviously a player in the plot against Trump.
That's why they're called "notables" and not "proofs". Simply a recommendation that others look at it.
In any case, let the baker decide. If he doesn't want it in, so be it…but he's wrong to omit.
Fuck off idiot. Wasn't even my post originally.
https://saraacarter.com/carter-page-suing-democratic-national-committee-over-steele-dossier/