what are anons thoughts on the entire Flynn lied/did'nt lie, delay,delay, delay, and now is he going to sue?
Isn't Carter Page suing,too?
Did they need the delay until after POTUS is acquited by Senate.
Is evidence going to be legally introduced in Flynn's lawsuit.
can he sue to get all records and FISAs?
Was Flynn's purpose to have a countersuit and introduce evidence? not peachmint.
if that is not it, I just don't understand Flynn's purpose or I have forgotten it.
what do you mean by timing.
for him to expose DS, he cannot settle without a trial?
if he settles, fake news will ignore it.
they are ignoring him now ,
so how will he get attention?
[D]ay [Of] [D]ays = [4] [Of] [4] = 404
>not this is how you legally introduce evidence
now* this is how you legally introduce evidence.
boy, one letter makes all the difference.
thanks
Is it the same guy that anons were looking for in the scavino/trump pic a few days ago. There was a third guy in that pic too,
some anons thought it was Ezra W, but it clearly was not Ezra.
could meme the back of Trump's laptop, although it doesn't look like a laptop.
>But do they really want to block witnesses?
yes, i think so.
they want to acquit and shove this back to house because it is illegitimate.
calling witness would legitimize it.
This is not really a legal event either, so I don't see how you can legally introduce evidence into a sham peachmint.
I think Flynn's lawsuit will be the legal way to introduce evidence.
baker —NOTABEL ^^^^^ SESSIONS TWAT
Bolton will most likely pull his manuscript very soon.
>Who does schift work for?
who paid schiff $7.8M
(or did he pay 7.8 for a coverup?)
what did he do for the money?
did he abscond funds ?
make a certain vote?
cover up a crime when he was a prosecutor?
I think it is the latter.
CNN keeps saying what a fantastic prosecutor he was out in CA
whose crime did AS cover up?