>>7968137 (pb)
>RAND PAUL's Q declined by CJ Roberts
Remember what Soros said at Davos RE SCJ Robert's
@6min5sec
https://www.facebook.com/trunews/videos/200547394404999/
==ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF 5G MOBILE NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY UNDER REAL-LIFE
CONDITIONS==
Toxicology Letters (2020), Accepted Date: 23 January 2020
ABSTRACT
This article identifies adverse effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation (hereafter
called wireless radiation) reported in the premier biomedical literature. It emphasizes that
most of the laboratory experiments conducted to date are not designed to identify the more
severe adverse effects reflective of the real-life operating environment in which wireless
radiation systems operate. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the
carrier signal. The vast majority do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic
stimuli (such as chemical and biological) acting in concert with the wireless radiation. This
article also presents evidence that the nascent 5G mobile networking technology will affect not
only the skin and eyes, as commonly believed, but will have adverse systemic effects as well.
url to share this paper:
sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.01.020
ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF 5G MOBILE NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY UNDER REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS
PAPER
>Roberts is clearly not comfortable reading this question.
>Clearly uncomfortable and hesitsnt in my opinion.
What if the Question named the individual by name, but then Roberts said the "presumed whisleblower" instead of reading the name?