dChan
Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:13 p.m. No.7970325   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0338 >>0485 >>0548 >>0553 >>0825 >>0978 >>0979 >>1030

The White House

17 witnesses—picked by Democrats—have already testified.

But if Democrats want more, here are some suggestions

⬇️

twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1223013501486141440

 

Here's what I want:

I want Adam Schift

I want Hunter Biden

I want Joe Biden

I want, I want the whistleblower…

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:14 p.m. No.7970338   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0385 >>0485 >>0825 >>0978 >>0979 >>1030

>>7970325

>17 witnesses—picked by Democrats—have already testified.

>But if Democrats want more, here are some suggestions

 

Mark Meadows

Jay Sekulow just addressed this brilliantly.

"Democrats may not like that we've been able to respond to their 17 witnesses this time around… but the fact remains, they've called 17 of them."

twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1223018528594370560

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:24 p.m. No.7970462   🗄️.is 🔗kun

126th question, from @SenDanSullivan for WH: how can Senate be accused of "cover up" if Senate makes decision based on House "overwhelming" evidence?

Philbin: Exactly.

twitter.com/joelpollak/status/1223022777495511043

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:30 p.m. No.7970530   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7970511

>My favorite dimwitted copypasta homotard. How ya doing today? I was hoping you would have gotten the ching chang virus and ded. Maybe tomorrow.

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:35 p.m. No.7970589   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0598 >>0825 >>0978 >>0979 >>1030

Kimberley Strassel

Schiff is "appalled" at the "smearing" of Intel staff? And where again does Carter Page go to get his reputation back, after Schiff smeared him from a fake dossier on the floor of Congress? Just asking. High dudgeon does not sit well on the unprincipled.

twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1223021200651112449

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:40 p.m. No.7970638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0778

Burn! Three congresspersons wrote letters to Ukraine asking for dirt of @POTUS

💥♦️💥♦️💥♦️💥♦️💥♦️

What’s the impeachment equivalent for congressional lawbreaking?

twitter.com/superyayadize/status/1223025971965648896

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 3:52 p.m. No.7970752   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0763 >>0764 >>0775 >>0896

>>7970726

>Any one post clip of Roberts getting pissed during impeachment? What happened? Not covered by Bret Bayer.

 

Curtis Houck

John Roberts was NOT happy with @EWarren's nasty question about whether the legitimacy of SCOTUS (and Roberts himself) would be sullied if there are no witnesses in the Senate trial

twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1223023679795232770

Anonymous ID: 825301 Jan. 30, 2020, 4:12 p.m. No.7970984   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Lindsey Graham Retweet

Sen. @LindseyGrahamSC: I’m increasingly optimistic that Republicans will move to a final verdict by Tuesday. The President will be acquitted in a bipartisan manner.

twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1223016450522107904