>>8103424

It was never an actual Q&A.

It was a load test to determine 8chan's capacity before an upgrade, and another test after the upgrade.

Don't you imagine Q team had a set of predetermined answers and either asked their own questions from another device, or only cherry-picked the anon questions that they had prepared responses for?

Don't get me wrong – I love Q and what Q is doing – and I find no fault with Q.

But it was a load test, and the predetermined answers were carefully crafted to be ambiguous, subject to alternate interpretations, in most cases.

>>8103648

>>8103625

LB I tried to reply to a post with 3 images.

The result was two blank posts, post # only, no images. Looked like a dolt but it wasn't muh fault!

This bread I posted 5 images & it worked.

A likely reason is more DDoS attacks on 8kun with the mitigation steps being taken affecting some of the servers but not all.

>>8103704

Tell us what "False, moon landings are real" means then.

Explain what "No. Highest classification. Consider the vastness of space."

means. Every anon with a belief in something assumed this statement referred to their personal belief system – whether God, angels, aliens, ETs, demons, science, etc.

My statement that {some} answers were deliberately ambiguous stands unchallenged.

>>8103757

Correct. Imprecise questions garner imprecise answers.

>>8103777

Не за что.

>>8103782

If you remove the comma it says

false moon landings are real

In other words were some moon landings faked? (Stanley Kubrick & tons of photographic evidence say so.)

Are we alone? No. Consider the vastness of space.

A Christian believing in God can take this answer to refer to God's vast creation and His presence, "we are not alone because God exists".

Hang around and you will learn to read ambiguous phrases, and identify/question all hidden underlying assumptions.

Don't assume I'm saying I know the answers either! Just pointing out massive ambiguity that one can resolve either way depending on their point of view.