>>8105590 (lb)
Shortly after the Flynn/Stone comments, someone asked Pres. Trump who Anonymous is, but he would not say. He said we would be surprised. Q was not said, though. Not sure if this is a miscommunication.
Oh, interesting! While I was listening to that ABC News livestream where Anonymous was mentioned, Q posted another link to it.
>>8105541
>>8105541
But, Q, he didn't say "Q"! There's another "Anonymous" out there, too, who was doing those videos. So this is a bit confusing.
I didn't hear the "Q" – just the "Anonymous". That's a BIG deal. Sorry, Q, but I think it's a miss.
… unless this is Q, too.
How did you get that from the context?
I was listening to a live stream that included it. I don't think there was a chance for editing.
https://youtu.be/dNCI18p9wSw
I just listened again a couple times on that ABC News live stream (which is still going). Q was NOT said.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNCI18p9wSw
It's in this live steam about -47 minutes from NOW. It's still going.
Yes, true. It needs to be the right question, though. I'm guessing that Pres. Trump answered based on the implication that the person was asking about Q. But that wasn't the question.
I don't get that from the context. But you're welcome to show me how you made that connection.
Nothing was said in the context about the op ed that I can tell. I just see a new question about "Anonymous". Please lay it out with quotes.
Red AND cap. 8kun online shouting.
OK, thank you. That spells it out nicely.
That was my point, actually. The response sounded like the implication was that it was about Q, though. We've got to be clear about these things.