>>8106339 pb

Q posts isn't wrong. ding bat.

yet the common interpretation of it is?

>>8106409 pb

>>8106335 pb

>>8105541 pb

Shows how quickly they ask the question when it's about someone they want to defend.

THEIR anonymous, who smeared and lied about POTUS is their hero, so they ask it right away, since they want to blame POTUS for firing them.

Our "Q" ? months go by and they never ask.

They try to avoid the subject in reference to an opinion by POTUS. If he said "yes" that would that confirm coming arrests?

Are they magical thinkers, as long as they don't ask, it's not real, and might go away?

Head in the sand?

>>8106793

>>8106772

"resign" Mass media has to soften the blow?

>>8106831

A witness came forward to testify that Jack Ruby produced kiddy porn with Jack Valenti. Some researchers have discovered that Jack Ruby's death was faked. The researcher that found Ruby and reported on it was "86-ed"

With God's grace the sauce will be forthcoming.