>So Ask the Q ! Edition
then again, what would the question actually be?
which one? who? what? are you affiliated?
now that'd be warface
yup, question was meant at large, thanks fer baking service
well, seems to be the crux of the issue, at least for them. Who/what Q is, we know (at least in part), and they think they do. Trump being part of it is long obvious, but indeed not yet official
sorta leads to your post: do you mean he could not deny his involvement?
because that's something i've often thought when "the Question" was discussed/desired was that coherently with the rest of the op, seems most likely that he would deflect or flat out deny involvement: they've kept it at plausible deniability all this time, and took many pains to make sure autists had enough to be convinced. why would they break with that now? election momentum is building but we're still far away… absent some major catalyst - and even then - i don't quite see them going public this way…