Q, confirm your highlighting of the video in that tweet was about Trump knowing the identify of the "anonymous" writer of the Op-Ed and book, and not The Q?

I think many anons understand this already. For clarification.

kek, also, want to tell us who that is?!

Reminder of this QProof (that Q got kinda mad we might've missed, kek):

Q understood leaks would be coming out before they did come out about Jussie Smollett.

>>8106563

see: >>8106548

>>8106553

Twitterfags gonna twitterfag.

>>8106611

>WE

Some don't, which is why the clarification would be good for those who don't.

>>8106569

This: >>8106616

Sounds like a you problem.

>>8106621

"WHO IS Q" IS NOT THE QUESTION

Doxxing Q would be a bad thing.

"What is Q?" and if Trump is connected to Q, as Q+, is The Q.

>>8106559

>>8106646

oh fuck off

>>8106671

They're not fed charges.

>>8106715

>>8106687

Not only the hate crime, but the mail fraud is a federal charge.

>>8106778

Have you seen the past two breads?

>>8106803

>>8106923

Go back to where ever you came from.

<haha it's pence, and that's why Trump is running for reelection with him!

This fucking place.

>>8107136

>>8107112

That's who I think it is.

No one knew Eric Ciaramella until the impeachment shit though, some people would be surprised.

>>8107143

Pretty sure it's r/qult trying to set a fake and gay narrative. Or they're just fucking stupid.

>>8107173

>>8107143

Like this: >>8107164

Bringing back all the old shill tactics.