Anonymous ID: e0a7b9 Feb. 13, 2020, 12:19 p.m. No.8126571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6893 >>7032 >>7232

Senate Passes Cruz Amendment on Successful Soleimani Mission

 

'Despite 34 Democrats refusing to recognize the brave men and women of our military and intelligence community, I'm pleased to see the Senate passed my amendment with strong bipartisan support'

February 13, 2020

|

202-228-7561

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today issued the following statement on the passage of his amendment, based off his resolution, honoring members of the military and intelligence community and President Trump, for carrying out the successful mission that killed Qasem Soleimani, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF) and a designated terrorist:

 

"Today, the Senate passed my amendment commending our armed forces, our intelligence community, and President Trump for bringing an end to Qasem Soleimani, one of the world's most dangerous terrorists. Soleimani was responsible for the killing of at least 603 Americans in Iraq and posed an imminent risk to the safety of American citizens around the world.

 

"My amendment to honor those involved in the successful mission to eliminate Soleimani was modeled on the resolution the Senate unanimously passed in 2011 recognizing President Obama for killing Osama Bin Laden. Despite 34 Democrats refusing to recognize the brave men and women of our military and intelligence community, I'm pleased to see the Senate passed my amendment with strong bipartisan support."

 

https://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=4927

Anonymous ID: e0a7b9 Feb. 13, 2020, 12:22 p.m. No.8126600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6681 >>6893 >>7032 >>7232

Washington Examiner Editor Out After Colleague Secretly Recorded ‘Sexist and Hateful’ Comments

 

The high-level bloodletting at the Washington Examiner continued this week with the dramatic ouster of its managing editor on Monday, days after the conservative magazine fired its breaking news editor for sharing a lewd video.

 

Toby Harnden, a British journalist who joined the Examiner as managing editor in 2018, parted ways with the outlet on Monday morning.

 

Here’s where things get messy: Harnden was out after the aforementioned breaking news editor accused him of misconduct in a lengthy email, obtained by Mediaite, which included recordings of conversations.

 

“Toby is no longer with the Washington Examiner, but we do not comment on personnel matters,” Examiner editor-in-chief Hugo Gurdon wrote to Mediaite when reached for comment. He declined to say whether Harnden was fired. Harnden, when reached for comment, directed Mediaite to his lawyer, who did not respond to multiple emails and calls.

 

The ouster comes a week after Jon Nicosia, the Examiner’s breaking news editor, was fired on January 31. Days later, Nicosia sent an email to the outlet’s editor in chief accusing Harnden of mistreating staffers and making sexist and homophobic comments about employees.

 

Nicosia himself was fired for sending a tweet containing a lewd video to colleagues on Slack. He wrote a lengthy email to Gurdon defending himself, claiming that he posted the video (it involves a group of marines and a pink dildo) because he thought it “had the potential to become a controversial news story.” He pointed to similarly racy stories that the Examiner had published.

 

Nicosia — who previously worked at Mediaite, and once disclosed his true identity and felony conviction in a confessional post on this site — also included in his email to Gurdon screenshots of what he described as “sexist and hateful texts” from Harnden as well as alleged recordings of conversations, which Mediaite reviewed.

 

“Toby Harnden has fostered and created an environment of sexism, retribution, and fear,” Nicosia wrote. “He has spewed multiple sexist and homophobic things in my time there [all recorded].”

 

In one of the recordings, made secretly by Nicosia, a voice purported to be Harnden’s complains he wasn’t invited to a company retreat on Sea Island in Georgia, while a staffer he refers to as “miss f*cking tits and ass” was allowed to go.

 

In a text exchange, he purportedly refers to a former Examiner staffer as a “Fcking sour, stupid btch” and a “fat fcking waste of food.” In another, he targets two staffers for complaining that he was “inappropriate” and “yelled at people.” One screenshot shows him referring to a former staffer as a “little pssy.”

 

Nicosia accuses Harnden in his email of belittling one female staffer and making “her life hell.” He also writes that Harnden, a Fleet Street veteran with stints at the Daily Telegraph, the Sunday Times and the Daily Mail, was criticized by staff for trying to turn the conservative magazine into a tabloid.

 

In the secret recordings, Harnden also reveals some behind the scenes gossip at the Examiner. He says commentary editor Tim Carney, for those curious, makes $160,000 per year, with a nice $40,000 annual sweetener from the American Enterprise Institute. Harnden also complains that executive editor Philip Klein only wrote 11 posts in one month for the high-metabolism news site, asking: “While we’re at it, what’s the point of Klein?”

 

When Nicosia was fired, he posted several tweets, which were swiftly deleted, suggesting he had recorded conversations with Examiner bosses.

 

“Revenge is a dish best served cold,” he wrote.

 

https://www.mediaite.com/news/washington-examiner-editor-out-after-colleague-secretly-recorded-sexist-and-hateful-comments/

Anonymous ID: e0a7b9 Feb. 13, 2020, 12:26 p.m. No.8126637   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Green group sues Trump over major environmental rollback

 

An environmental group is trying to block one of President Trump’s most far-reaching environmental rollbacks from taking effect, arguing the administration has not provided proper access to public documents on a new rule that would limit the scope of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

 

The Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) is seeking an injunction from the U.S. District Court in Charlottesville that would block changes to the bedrock environmental law that are slated to take effect in early March.

 

The suit is the latest move in SELC’s 17-month battle to get public records from the White House detailing the backing for the January rule, which the administration has said it will not be able to provide until November. The administration is holding commenting sessions before the rule is finalized.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

“The irony of all this is that the comment process puts a high value on informed input from the public, but at the same time, the Trump administration is keeping information away from the public,” said Kym Hunter, a senior SELC attorney who filed the request for the preliminary injunction.

 

“The rules call for openness and transparency, but instead the administration has shut the door and boarded the windows.”

 

NEPA requires agencies to evaluate how pipelines, highways and some oil and gas development affects the environment and nearby communities.

 

The law has been a repeated target of President Trump, who has vowed to speed the construction of fossil fuel infrastructure and eliminate barriers to construction projects.

 

Trump’s changes would limit the breadth of the law, excluding some projects from undergoing NEPA review, like those that receive little federal funding. It also opens the door for more industry involvement in reviewing the environmental impacts of their projects.

 

The SELC suit marks the first major legal action against the law, though a number of environmental groups have said they are weighing their legal options.

 

The White House Council on Environmental Quality, which crafted the new NEPA rule, did not immediately respond to request for comment.

 

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/482991-green-group-sues-trump-over-major-environmental-rollback

Anonymous ID: e0a7b9 Feb. 13, 2020, 12:31 p.m. No.8126686   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6722 >>6750 >>6755 >>6803 >>6893 >>6960 >>7032 >>7232

JUST IN: Trump says he may end practice of officials listening in on calls with foreign leaders

 

Trump floats halt to officials listening in on calls with foreign leaders

© Getty Images

 

President Trump said Thursday he may end the practice of having national security and foreign service staff listen in on his calls with foreign leaders after a July call with the president of Ukraine triggered his impeachment in the House.

 

Trump complained extensively about Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a key witness in the House impeachment inquiry, during a radio interview with Geraldo Rivera, accusing him of being "insubordinate" by raising concerns about the president's conduct on the July 25 call.

 

"Why are so many people allowed to listen to your phone calls anyway?" Rivera asked.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

"Well, that’s what they’ve done over the years," Trump said. "When you call a foreign leader people listen. I may end the practice entirely. I may end it entirely."

 

Top White House and national security officials typically listen in on presidential phone calls to keep everyone on the same page and create a record of the conversation.

 

Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky set off the impeachment inquiry after a whistleblower raised concerns that the president was pressuring Zelensky to investigate his political rivals while holding up hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid.

 

The president has repeatedly said he was aware other officials were listening to that conversation, which he has maintained was "perfect,” repeatedly telling people to “read the transcript.”

 

The House impeached Trump in December for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, and the Senate acquitted him last week.

 

Vindman, a Purple Heart recipient detailed to the National Security Council at the time, reported to his superior that he was concerned about the political nature of Trump's call.

 

The White House last week forced out Vindman, and he was reassigned within the Pentagon.

 

"I’m not a fan of Vindman," Trump said Thursday.

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/482999-trump-floats-halt-to-officials-listening-in-on-calls-with-foreign

Anonymous ID: e0a7b9 Feb. 13, 2020, 12:49 p.m. No.8126852   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6863 >>6986

Breaking: Mnuchin admits Trump's budget cuts your earned benefits in Social Security. "Slowing the rate of increase" is Washington-speak for cutting benefits and breaking the Social Security and Medicare guarantee.

 

https://twitter.com/SenateFinance/status/1227699102567280642

 

Dis true?

Anonymous ID: e0a7b9 Feb. 13, 2020, 1:11 p.m. No.8127085   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7182 >>7202 >>7221 >>7232

Powerful Liberal Union Warns AGAINST Sanders, Warren Healthcare For All Plan

 

F

inally, a powerful and liberal group is standing up against Warren and Sanders’ dangerous Medicare for All promises. The state of Nevada’s most powerful union, The Culinary Union, which was a “key driver of the Democrats’ 2016 victories in Nevada, is warning over 50,000 hospitality workers that the Medicare for All plans backed by Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren will ‘end culinary health care’ benefits” reports the Free Beacon.

 

In a December town hall, Bernie Sanders told the union that “giving up their health care will bump their wages by $12,000.” Immune to Sanders’ empty promises, the group has no interest in losing their health plans which were “hard-won for union members who staged strikes and work stoppages to wring concessions from casino owners and now cover more than 130,000 people.”

 

Bad news for Bernie and Elizabeth, as The Culinary Union is “a political heavyweight in the state, spending more than $2.2 million on political activities between 2016 and 2018” reports Free Beacon. Furthermore, “not only did the union play a key role in Hillary Clinton’s victory over Sanders in the 2016 Nevada Caucuses, but it also helped the Democratic nominee with the state during the general election.” That’s a powerful union.

 

Committed to defeating President Trump in 2020, “the union remains staunchly opposed to the president, calling members to ‘unite to DEFEAT Trump in November’ but its national office has remained neutral in the Democratic primary” of course, until now. At stake is the union’s health care plan established in 1983 after hard-pressed bargaining. With the plan, members are offered “access to a 24-hour health center and two pharmacies, among other perks, all without monthly premium payments.”

 

Members even heckled Sanders in December when he discussed his Medicare for All proposal. Just what does this union, and likely others, want to see from the primary? The Union put out a flyer stating their support for Joe Biden, Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, and Tom Steyer would all “protect culinary health care.” Once again, Democrats are having trouble rallying behind a candidate.

 

At least this institution has committed to what they don’t want, and one can only hope other liberal groups and organizations can understand the irreversible damage Healthcare for All would do.

 

https://thegreggjarrett.com/liberal-union-against-sanders-warren-healthcare-plan/?utm_source=socialflow