>>8146751

>allegedly

>>8146830

I wonder what they were discussing?

>pic related

>>8146882

>my first attempt

Nicely done!

Keep going :)

>>8146881

>>8147109

>>8147182

>>8147200

I was explaing this to boomer friend last night:

1. making clear the dichotomoy - extreme sentence for Stone, letting McCabe off with nothing

2. McCabe relief at investigation "ending" immediately slammed with tweet from LP letting Andy know she's been talking (he's fucked)

→ in psyops, stressing someone out, they get relief, then hammer them with something worse = 5x the impact

Normies won't understand # 2, but they DO understand the 2-tier justice system and whether they like/dislike Stone, it only infuriates them more and appeals to their innate fairness (which translate into a greater desire for actual Justice, for all, especially those who are coup-plotters and DNC hacks)

1. POTUS tweet re: Stone, Barr's response is calculated to create distance between them, same play as with POTUS-Sessions.

>>8147329

He is an outright charlatan.

>>8147363

I've been working on him for 10 years and he's really starting to get it. He's still very cynical and won't let himself believe anything will happen but he calls me all the time to get perspective (decode) on what he sees on the "news".

Planting and tending to seeds takes TIME, especially with older people or those who are strong ideologues.

>>8147390

I may get flamed for this but I would not doubt it. People have to keep in mind that no one is infallible and just because it's in a widely-cited book doesn't mean it's true. Conjecture isn't fact. Assertions and conjecture aren't facts nor are interpretations. If the foundation is incorrect, then analysis and conclusions will also be incorrect. Good people can be wrong and often are. No one, even a great patriot, should be considered as always right.