>>8143736 pb
It seems as if there is no flak when mentioning the obvious dangers of 5G.
I got one hit last bread, that's not over a target.
But if the FCC lists the health issues, aren't they complicit if they roll out 5G and millions get sick/die?
>>8143736 pb
It seems as if there is no flak when mentioning the obvious dangers of 5G.
I got one hit last bread, that's not over a target.
But if the FCC lists the health issues, aren't they complicit if they roll out 5G and millions get sick/die?
Got it down to a science.
The 5g rollout may be waiting to see what population lives there before inundating the area with shortwaves.
If you stay, we tell 5g to go back. If they continue moving in illegals, the fcc allows it and they bathe in radiation at every corner.
That's what I read.