>>8155391 pb
FWIW, I read this and I'm unconvinced this guy is spouting anything but misinformation.
Some background on me - Just a guy, but very, very technical and am aware of possible methods of how certain parts of "UFO" technology works (specifically EM propulsion, power generation management, etc.) So much of this article focuses on "super cavitation", which isn't the real game changer – you just don't need it for above water or space. Anything appearing in a declassified patent is bullshit. Oh…and insiders encouraging him to go public? Puhleeze.
This smacks of disinformation and empty hype to me.