>>8176195 (pb)
To be fair, that’s mostly anon interpretation. Q has been up front about providing disinformation to smoke out enemies as well as his claims being markers for future events (2 year delta, for example) or as a somewhat misleading statement with a secondary meaning only to be understood after the events have transpired.
“News unlocks the map,” the map doesn’t unlock the news.
“Future proves past,” the present is not predicting the future.
This is a research, redpilling, strategic operation. Not a prophecy of The Storm meant for anons to ascribe specific dates and timelines to.