>>8182590

Save them, open them by their own and put some time into letting the energy build up enough that you feel them to a point of "ouch" then you know it's not in your mind.

I can tell you about the science of it.

You can email me, I'll setup a temporary email address so I don't doxx myself on here, up to you, this is research which can change the world when manifested in more than images, and when advanced a bit beyond the current level of sophistication.

But, getting there is going to take some doing as all things naturally do, if you are interested, well it doesn't take any special skills, just the ability to feel it and enough interest to drive you to understand and experiment further.

>>8182622

Sure, got tons of them, but I shared the best, but the more you see the more you might understand it.

Really need to share it in a more private space though.

Email me at antigravfanatic@gmail.com

And I'll share more.

I'll upload one more here for now…

>>8182622

>>8182669

eek!

>>8182686

Ok, so what's the final number?

And where does Pi end?

And how many books can be written?

Sure, useful variation is limited, but there is literally zero limit to subtle differences.

You could paint a billion pictures, all unique.

You could then paint a quadrillion more, each just a little different.

How many numbers between 1 and 2?

Or even, between 1 and 1.1?

You could argue it's infinity many potential numbers.

Infinity is never realized, it is merely the potential for something to be inexhaustible.

>>8182701

Wow, so why is such language nessasary in your opinion?

So, a few things you need to recognize, when I am talking about aetheric energies, I am using "friction" as an analogy, though the analogy seems rather apt.

It does create an energy that feels like heat, so I think it is a phenomena like friction, but friction of aetheric energies which are, well I don't know what they are. I don't know if they have what should be termed rest mass.

Anyway, I said that friction isn't really about inertia, and well, I'm right, sure inertia is one method of resisting instant deceleration, but it isn't the only one, you can make friction with something that has negligible (and in theory zero) inertial mass, you just need to be applying a force to it.

Anyway, then you go on to say it is about heat and energy loss, well yes both of those things do occur, but you were saying that it had to do with inertia, then you change that to heat and energy loss. Well, again, the aetheric energies do manifest such an effect, but does the aetheric energies have what regular matter would recognize as heat, friction, mass?

Perhaps mostly, no. Because mostly these energies aren't readily measurable by most instruments.

Even so, the friction and inertia might be in a sense "independent" to the physical manifestation of these things under normal circumstances.

Though, ultimately it is my goal to figure out how to bring those aetheric qualities to physical manifestation that can be measured by crude instruments.

>>8182643

Erm, well aetheric energy that is able to be absorbed by our DNA, feeds out DNA energy naturally enough.

So right handed spin will help heal you because it feeds your DNA…

And left handed energy will upset that.

Sorry I only saw the question now.

here is another image, and email me if you like at antigravfanatic@gmail.com

>>8182742

Nope.

>>8182742

Had a good feel, nothing comes close to being impressive.

I am not saying that these don't work aetherically, but I tend to think they are more symbolic.

Symbolid means that they do not work so much on their own merit, but rather, well because they are linked.

I have found that even regular words and numbers and measurements work symbolically, I had an interesting demo of that one day when i felt energy jump from a described length on a table of legths.

The energy jumped out of a length that was within 1/200th of a milimeter of a match for being in resonance with a piece of Pipe I had vibrating near the laptop.

So I am clear that symbolism does wok, but it's not what I try to do, though I do you numbers at times symbolically as it is impractical to represent large numbers in a physical way.

Numbers that can generate potentially tangible energy…

Feel the 919 and 528

>>8182795

This is all quite irrelivant.

What I was saying simply is that by exgineering the medium of space, the medium on which the game of matter and energy is played, the rules change, and that by creating different types of aetheric flux of sufficient density you can make modified space, and not just one or two different types, but many many types, let's say hundreds or thousands or millions.

In theory, probably many more types, as you have different materials, shapes, frequencies and other conditions to play with.

So getting caught in a side discussion of if you can modify space a million ways or an infinite number of ways is seriously missing the point!

I can make an argument that space could be infinity divided as per Zeno's paradox, you could argue that space is Quantanized into Planck length… I could argue that infinite frequencies could exist between 1hz and 2 and you could argue Planck time…

But, again don't get caught in the minutia, the point is that if you can re-engineer the laws of physics the physics UFO's show off become plausible!

>>8182802

Interesting, so i tried just putting the tiny circle with the dot above, I intuitively got what it does…

I can feel the enhancement in the left circle.

Basically a small circle will have a high rate of rotation (due to centrifugal forces which polarize the left and right handed energies) and the dots, though it eats energy, it sucks energy down from above. This helps enhance the energy in the circle below.

I have recently been putting things above circles specifically to do this.

Oh, and when I say "above" I mean it should be displayed on a vertical plane, not lying flat.

>>8182850

Not claiming I am the only one to work in this field.

but my technology is quite different to that employed in radionics.

Same general type of energy, different mythologies.

IMO the energy I create is stronger, and this is because my goals are different, Radionics is about tuning in a specific energy, my goal is to create very serious levels of energy to change how physics works for the purpose of Free Energy and Antigravity.

In other words, I'm making a UFO and radionics is not well to that IMO.

>>8182876

Have you actually tried to see if you can feel energy from the images?

I ask not that I'm sure you will, it's basically a coin toss.

But I ask because if you haven't, then what are you afraid of?

I mean, maybe you aren't afraid, you just don't "believe" it, but if it happened when you didn't believe it, then you'd face massive and uncomfortable cognitive dissonance.

So, you don't try it because it can't be real, because it "better not be real' because you have a small closed mind about just things.

And that's fine, but then just ignore such subjects!

Or, try it, maybe you won't feel anything, or maybe you well, but I bet you passed judgement on this without even trying it.

>>8182927

You said it was a scam, seemed rather clear what you were trying to say.

But, really what I have is designs that embedded in light, or physical form demonstrates a tangible (to many) energetic (aetheric woowoo chi orgone) type phenomena which can be enginnered and understood in a logical manner, which might eventually be just as rigorious as any other hard science and could transform the world…

That people can experiment with at no cost.

And could transform humanity to a Star Trek level of technology eventually.

Plus such tech has probably already been developed but might never be released, who knows.

Any you can believe all of none of this, or ask for evidence, but the only evidence I have is that lots of people besides me report feeling things, or health effects (typically very positive, I am the only one I've hurt with misadventures).

It costs nothing to experiment with this besides time and effort as you can draw the designs or make them out of scrap wire/materials.

>>8182882 (You)

>But you have conveniently failed to acknowledge the valuable works already achieved by the field's true pioneers.

So, as I mentioned i discovered this stuff from researching a different group of pioneers than the ones you mentioned.

The work of radionics played almost zero part in my work.

Sometimes I bother to mention the work of Dan A. Davidson how found images could create detectable energies, albeit his designs were drawn and not n a screen.

There are many many many different groups of experimenters and researchers and then there is the whole magick stuff.

I have no experience with radionics and no eal experience of how well they work.

>The many anons who have questioned your premise, might give you some credibility if you had mentioned their work,

I don't think many people find radionics to be that credible.

But you say it is "convenient" and then go on to explain how it isn't convenient.

But while you want to imply that I am trying to claim sole discoverer of this whole field, I have done no such thing, though there is very little commonality between radionics and what I do beyond "wires convey (subtle) energy".

>>but my technology is quite different to that employed in radionics.

>For two breads you have been putting up pics and telling anons to "feel them". You can't be seriously claiming that this is any different than the patented claims of the two pioneers of this research, that you have failed to mention.

Which patents do you refer to?

At any rate, yes my techniques and discoveries and point of view is different, unique compared to that of radionics if those are the patents you mean.

If you think that you have seen the same designs elsewhere (ok, one design I will openly admit I stole from a crop circle, you can guess which one). then please show me, I'll be tricked pink, i love to see that I am discovering the same principles as others, it is very validating.

>>8182882 (You)

>>Same general type of energy, different methodologies.

>Mythologies aren't patentable.

Typo, methodologies.

>You and I (apparently) have much different concepts about how these "ships" navigate the Aether.

I'm not interested in their navigation, but rather how they manifest antigravity and reduced inertia (or inertial acceleration).

If you have insight to this, please spill.

I have not heard of radionics practitioners claiming antigravity or Free Energy.

>>8182987

Paid for what? You've lost me.

>>8182987

>>8183034

Nevermind, I get what you mean, the top secret black budget tech.