>>8183145

>>8183025 (LB)

>So, as I mentioned i discovered this stuff from researching a different group of pioneers than the ones you mentioned.

How could you possible know? I never mentioned either of them by name...

>>8183025 (LB)

>

>The work of radionics played almost zero part in my work.

I'll say it again. For two breads, you have been telling anons to "feel the energy" from your diagrams. This very premise - that a diagram can work just as well as the machine it expresses - is completely born from patented Radionic research. It is now quite unnecessary for me to point out that you didn't discover any of this.

>>8183025 (LB)

>I have not heard of radionics practitioners claiming antigravity or Free Energy.

Anon, that is not even close to what I said.

>>8183025 (LB)

>I'm not interested in their navigation, but rather how they manifest antigravity and reduced inertia (or inertial acceleration).

>

>If you have insight to this, please spill.

My understanding is that there is no need to rewrite or, as you said, "to create very serious levels of energy to change how physics works". I am not even sure what "change how physics works" is supposed to mean.

Anyway, they are not "propelling" these craft through "space". They are surrounding the ship and sealing it in an electro-magnetic bubble of Aether. They "contract" Aether in the direction they wish the ship to go, and "expand" that Aether behind the "aft" section. No rewriting physics, because the ship is not actually the thing moving. That is about as far as I am gonna bother to try and explain it. Nothing personal, anon. Just been here for countless hours and my eyes have about had it.

>>8183145

There is no doubt that this will work. But I've been up too long to think clearly about the title of the book that would really help you. Sorry. But the book talks about employing this very tactic that you mentioned, and postulated that the very old and ornate works of say, iron gates and fences, etc., did exactly this.

Very comparable to the Radionics use of the labyrinth or maze, or even similar to the "glyphs" surrounding Epstein's Temple.

>>8183175

>Or, this demo with the word Love

This is all too familiar to anyone who knows the work of Dr. Masaru Emoto, and his book, "Message in the Water".

>>8183282

>How do you know I even know them

Ah, don't get hung up on it. We agree more than we disagree.

>>8183282

>I don't really disagree with your model of how a UFO works, rather I would interpret such manipulation of the aether to involve what I am talking about if that makes sense (if you energize and vortex the aether into a torus vortex then you carry your aether with you for instance).

>

>UFO's most assuredly have an aetheric vortex field, or some do.

This is one of several videos I have, which shows the Craft being encapsulated. Again, surround the Craft in an insulated bubble of Aether, then Contract and Expand the Aether, in front of and behind (respectively) the Craft.

The Craft could make "impossible" turns, accelerations, and sudden stops, none of which would "violate" or have to "rewrite physics", because it is not the Craft moving, it is the Aether's contraction and expansion both pulling and propelling a contained bubble of Aether. The Craft is merely along for the ride.

Comedy break!

Jim Breuer making fun of the Boston Bombing, the Mockingbird manipulation, and the Big Brother, "trust the government" mind-control. The part about "Marshal" law and the helicopters…This is CNN…dun-DUN-DUHN.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGALWFRm-pQ

>>8183500

Pretty much. His observations were spot on. "We used police, dogs, machine guns, tanks, and helicopters…What can I say? We can't find him. He's a reeeal good hider." ←I was laughing so hard I got a stitch.

>>8183566

https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/