>>8218493 lb

>>8218464 lb

im not a homo defender. i dont see it as natural. its a product of programming and abuse. but i also dont think people should be judged by their victimization. you would know that if you bothered to converse with anons instead of just insult them because they disagree with your holier than thou personality and opinions. its not the opinion i was attacking. its the method of delivery. anon posts unsolicited opinions on the board purely as bait. but if another anon tries to discuss differing opinions with them, all they get in return are words like "wipe your chin you missed some" and "faggot". this is because they are not here to discuss opinions, or even any topic other than that of their own obsession. they are here to espouse their own ignorance and act as though anyone that might see it differently doesnt even warrant a logical explanation of why they think the way they do.they are nothing but a troll posting bait to the board without conversing with anons and attempting to make the board appear as antigay, just like them. same tactics as muh joo shills. keep up newfag. here are some examples from this bread.

>>8218617

>>8218629

>>8218704

>>8218732

>>8218755

>>8218785

muh joo shills are real anon. if you dont realize that you havent been here very long. that doesnt mean that everyone who discusses the subject is a shill, just that some of the spammers and anons who see the "jew" in every single happening and discussion while never discussing anything else are.

>>8218796

>Where's your defense of homos? Let's go.

>>8218770

the first line in my post that you replied to is literally "im not a homo defender". but you continue to slide the board by acting like every one disagrees with you, but that your opinions are so high and mighty that you dont have to discuss them yourself. i tried to discuss, not debate, because thats not what we're about here, with you in the last bread and you couldn't be bothered to get off of your high horse and participate in discussion. so my previous advise remains. rid yourself of this world, everyone you know will have their lives made better by it.

>>8219021

id like to see how greyhound plans on enforcing this policy. do they really expect all of their blue collar drivers to obstruct justice if an ICE agent attempts to board their bus and enforce the law.

>>8219168

i agree inland checkpoints are unconstitutional, but stopping a conveyance suspected of trafficking criminals, or attempting to board a bus at a terminal, or while it is stopped somewhere, to enforce the law is not unconstitutional imo.