Does it change the information from the interview with Cain? Nope. Q didn’t say anything about the interviewer personally. Information is information, regardless of the source.
Fuck your red text nigger. You are trying to dissuade people from listening to the information based on the an issue with the source that is irrelevant to the actual information Q posted about. You are a misinformation and distraction campaign. The red text now make you a glownigger.
It’s an interview. The information from Cain was directly referenced by Q. It has nothing to do with the interviewer. If you correlate your list of shills with the information Cain provides in the interview, you’re a lost cause or a shill yourself.
>it's almost always about the info.
Exactly. I’m not sure what’s so hard to understand about this. Or it’s shills doing what they do. Or both.
They are trying very hard to dissuade Anons from listening to the interview.
Next bread slide foreshadowed