Anon intakes and assesses info from many sources and judges by the quality of the info. Period.
You've misunderstood my comment and injected your own strawman then argued against it. That's faulty reasoning, anon.
There is no outside comms from Q, true, certainly agree on that point.
End.
They can swear or affirm that it is the truth. Both types of truth-telling are accepted in US courts of law.