We are not talking about "so called" born alive. That sentence is intentionally misleading.
The discussion centers around the FACT of a child who, having been born alive, is now a US citizen and entitled to all the protections thereof.
I remember when abortion, itself, was supposed to be rare. That was one of its selling points … to help women "in trouble" get out of problems caused by rape or incest. It was a decision made by society to end a pregnancy as early as possible in order to show compassion to a distressed mother to be who, through no fault of her own, was pregnant as the result of force or coercion.
Later, we added the option of saving the life of the mother when an abortion was necessary to do so. That argument was based on "corner cases" and condemned millions of infants to their deaths based on bullshit "medical necessity" diagnosis.
There was no thought whatsoever that she would be back for another next year and would, in fact, treat abortion as a way to deal with carelessness or as a way to punish a man who, having sired a child with her, had fallen into disfavor.
Women used to play a role as the gatekeepers of sexual morality. Intercourse represented a commitment to the future for them and they were motivated to limit that practice to men who saw matters the same.
For many women, that's too much work and not enough fun. They'd rather take their chances and kill their mistakes.
If abortion was limited to cases of medical necessity and rape, we'd have a couple hundred a year. Maybe. We would NOT have a multi-billion dollar business lobbying congress for ever more money.
But those are not the numbers we are seeing.
We haven't seen those numbers since the Roe v. Wade lie was decided. The plaintiff in that case has since admitted that she, coached by her free attorneys, lied.
What the problem is here is that if the child was kept alive through the abortion process (they will be) and thus all of its parts are intact for "harvesting", it is far more valuable than if hacked apart in the womb.
What is now "rare and unintentional" will become "common and deliberate" in short order because that is the direction of the economic incentive and because we are a culture of monsters who put nothing else in the balance beam.
Remember … abortions were "rare" until they became immensely profitable through cultural manipulation, aka "marketing". Late term abortions are being pushed now because there is more money in them than in the more-nearly humane 1st trimester abortions.
It's 100% a matter of the profit motive untempered by any other consideration.
You are painting a picture of a child who, having barely survived the mangling in the womb cannot be killed as an act of mercy.
I foresee children deliberately kept alive and intact through the delivery murdered afterward for the purpose of financial gain.
Are our children really only a crop? Plant a seed. Wait a few months. Harvest?
Abortion is murder for hire. After a child has left the womb, there cannot even be a fantasy that it has any positive impact on the health of the mother. After a woman has already consented to kill her unborn child, she should have NO say in it's fate after delivery.