Anonymous ID: da9e79 March 5, 2020, 8:09 a.m. No.8324442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4485 >>4749

>>8324208

ThankQ lawfag.

Ipse dixit – "it speaks for itself." Quite the lack of a reasoned argument in Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S.

 

So the CFPB case has not only the potential to restore proper separation of powers, but also perhaps to restore lawful constitutional money.

 

Reposting Breitbart article on the Seila Law LLC v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau case to be argued before the Supreme Court.

Anonymous ID: da9e79 March 5, 2020, 8:15 a.m. No.8324485   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8324442

Reference Trump EO 12/8/17 establishing a new seal for the National Credit Union Association (NCUA).

There has been some speculation by anons that a reformed NCUA will be used in conjunction with other executive actions to restore constitutional money and remove the unconstitutional power from the Fed.

(I realize Seila v. CFPB does not directly address the constitutionality of fiat money.)

Anonymous ID: da9e79 March 5, 2020, 8:21 a.m. No.8324524   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4539

>>8324517

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.