>>8380678 (pb)

This "Notable" is literally bullshit designed to silence anons who might fear looking stupid.

First, note how the "anon" says he initially started trying to archive "json". This is going to shut down most anons right there, and that's the point. No one actually gives a shit about archiving json. What anons care about is text and proper media files. This is VERY easy to understand.

Think it through: you don't need to understand more complex data types to grasp that a single post consists of some text (usually) and up to five media files. Or maybe there is a video embed. That's it. No need for a discussion of complex data types. The shill is mentioning json to inhibit anons who are not up on data types and don't wish to appear unsophisticated.

Then, notice how the shill is saying that an algorithm is selecting what media files are saved. And he says it is easy to discern. Again, this is intentionally designed to inhibit anons who don't want to seem silly for failing to discern something "easy".

But it is EASY to see that the VERY IDEA of an ALGORITHM picking what media files to save is MORONICAL.

ACTUAL HUMAN JUDGEMENT is what is required in selecting media files.

UNLESS you are an archivist. Then you save it ALL. And if you are not an archivist, then you don't persistently pretend to be one. Unless you are working in league with evildoers.

Think further: suppose you were an actual anon who was trying to archive, but was facing financial problems or technical issues. What would you do? You would SEEK ASSISTANCE from other anons. By contrast, this shill persistently posts reports on how he is archiving, thus conveying the impression that the task is being taken care of.

If any shills reply to this post, look closely at what they say: do they address the actual reasoning I am providing?

These people are STUPID.