Anonymous ID: 4fdef9 March 12, 2020, 9:13 p.m. No.8397097   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7175 >>7193 >>7250

Something is fishy about Julian Assange.

 

For one, his associates: Kim Dotcom is Cabal; Chelsea Manning is Cabal; Edward Snowden is Cabal.

 

For another: he's from the Satanic stronghold of Australia and grew up in a "cult" family.

 

For another: he was allowed (by the Cabal) to operate with impunity for years before they finally "took him down."

 

For another: couldn't the Cabal really have taken him down if they wanted?

 

For another: Assange never identified the damning emails in the big Podesta dump. People found them and connected the dots.

 

What is in Assange's favor? That he released the Podesta dump of emails at all.

 

BUT…what if Assange/Wikileaks was hacked? What if Assange never did realise them?

 

In fact, what if Assange was a honey pot all along – a way for the Cabal to neutralize real whistleblowers who thought they were reaching out to a safe and trusted source when they contacted Wikileaks?

 

What if Assange himself exposed Seth Rich as the whistleblower? Somehow the Cabal found out who Seth was.

 

Q has never said Assange is a patriot, but Q said Seth Rich was a patriot.

 

So… I'm wondering…

Anonymous ID: 4fdef9 March 12, 2020, 9:23 p.m. No.8397200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7246

>>8397175

That is odd.

 

Note that Trump has never said good things about Assange either. Trump has not exonerated Assange, and has said nothing to stop the extradition request to put Assange on trial in America. I always assumed Trump as just trying to protect Assange by bringing him to America under the auspices of a trial…but if Assange is innocent, why wouldn't Trump just offer him asylum instead?