Well DONE!
>>8491127 (PB)
>Very possibly fake news, old video from Israel
>>8491150 (PB)
>This is not motherfuckin' Israel. the Style of buildings don't match.
>Show us the original, or fuck off. There has been a LOT of this discounting going on, from the troop movements on trains, to couple other things. Those things are panning out though.
>>8491151 (PB)
Also, there's nothing 'fake' about that shit. (((you))) won't succeed!
^^2nd was me, sry anon!
>all good, anon.
>anons saw it quickly.
^^xactly, we'll correct, put in a fresh notable, and that's something FAKE NEWS never does, or if they do, they retract their error well after damage has hit its mark and done its work, so retraction irrelevant.
So….
Why would a Chinese Twatter account want to fake this???
Who behind, anyone digging on that account or video source?
Sense fuckery.
>This has a Soft Run Feel to it.
This would SUCK.
Not feeling the rolling of tanks into all major cities is exactly a Soft Run though.
Also, the [SCARE] is very real for the sheep. They be skittish now, just looked into the eyes of a wolf (still looking!).
>>8491348 ty anon! Good specificity.
Looked at Twatter account:
@Zhangli14896047
Based on a number of posts, this person wants freedom and to bring down the CCP.
Was probably duped themselves and posted on their twatter.
Agree mis-info, but doesn't look to be purposeful intent.
Miles Guo, Bannon's War Room, etc.
>So….
>Why would a Chinese Twatter account want to fake this???
>Who behind, anyone digging on that account or video source?
>Sense fuckery.
>well, it´s quite obvious that a lot of people try to attack the Q movement and connect it to disinfo. and it´s quite likely that there is someone being able to tweet in chinease I´d say.
>but not exactly something I would dig on tbh.
No worries, dug quickly and all looks good, see:
>Get on Social Media and SQUASH the disinfo!!
Agree, I've kept a social distance for a while, but hopefully other fags jump on to kill it before it snowballs much.
>>8491364 good review of comments anon.
> (pb) [15] Good[win]
In presser today, noted POTUS say to review in 14, or 15 days. Seemed deliberate the timing/change, very specific.