>>8527202 (lb)

>>8527056 (lb)

>In its inaugural year, HSI took 300 people into custody. That number more than tripled to 938 in FY 2011. The following year saw 967 arrests, but doubled to 1,877 in FY 2013. The next year had 1,770 arrests and FY 2015 saw 1,437. From Oct. 1, 2015 through Sept. 30, 2016 (the standard fiscal year), HSI picked up 1,952 people.

>2010: 300

>2011: 938

>2012: 967

>2013: 1877

>2014: 1770

>2015: 1437

>2016: 1952

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/us-human-trafficking-arrests-hit-all-time-high-in-2016

>In FY 2017, DHS’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE/HSI) initiated 833 human trafficking cases, resulting in 1,602 arrests

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-working-end-human-trafficking/

>In FY 2018, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) made 1,588 Human Trafficking arrests

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-fighting-prevent-human-trafficking-southern-border/

>In fiscal year 2019, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the principal investigative component of the Department of Homeland Security, arrested 2,197 criminals associated with human trafficking

https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-hsi-charlotte-nets-125-human-trafficking-arrests-fy-2019

Not really sure where those stats are coming from, unless there were more arrests than just from ICE HSI.

>>8527523

How exactly does that prove Q has inside information, is an insider, or coordinates with Trump?

You sure you know what a "Qproof" is?

>>8527568

Decode is probably more accurate. Your graphic presents information that explains further details about a crumb, but I don't see the proof in it unless I missed it.

>>8527557

I overcame the seemingly wide-spread impulse to nominate a post I didn't read that much.

>>8527614

That's the last chart I can find, but I can't seem to find how that anon/whoever found the stats for Trump.

>>8527613

I actually read things before I nominate them, kek.

Some anons nominate a big graphic 30 seconds after it was posted and you can tell they didn't even get half way through it.

>>8527619

>nothing is happening

I mean, that's blatantly false.

>Q isn't real

Q is real. There's been at least one outside confirmation by someone who would be in the know.

>What is the #1 best Q proof

That's subjective. In what way do you mean #1? Coolest, most interesting, most persuasive, etc?

>what is something that has happened as a result of Q's influence?

Anons are able to spread information to millions of people.

>>8527654

>>8527664

>he def said don't eat blood instead of we need blood

>>8527686

K Y S

Y

S

You pathetically irrelevant faggot.

>I need to make some shit up, so I'll make it something some literally random person did months after Q did something kinda like it idk I don't get paid enough

They stopped sending their best a long time ago, or even more hilariously this IS their best.

>>8527801

>anything else, anons?

Not the larp/Travis View post, which you rightfully didn't add.

They'll keep trying to get that shit in notables, and bakers I assume are aware of this.