Anonymous ID: 792bab March 26, 2020, 12:37 p.m. No.8575245   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5267

>>8575002

 

His "proof with metadata" I ain't downloading a JPG that comes as a zip file, anyone else?

 

The XMP date just has the creation date:

7/5/2018 7:33:30 PM and camera data: iPhone 7 front camera 2.87mm f/2.2

 

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1F4x6vLPcfq9xlwRQZaEXp8GEFhTYQHZa

Anonymous ID: 792bab March 26, 2020, 12:45 p.m. No.8575354   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Stanford doctors: Coronavirus fatality rate may be far lower than current models predict

 

The two professors of medicine recalculate a new rate based on the prevalence rate of the disease, not reported cases

 

The true fatality rate of the novel coronavirus may be much lower than current projections imply, according to two professors of medicine at Stanford University.

 

Dr. Eran Bendavid and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya postulate, in The Wall Street Journal, that the high estimated fatality rate of the coronavirus of 2%-4% is “deeply flawed.” They base their argument around the metrics of total individuals infected who die, rather than individuals with identified cases of the virus who have died.

 

“If the number of actual infections is much larger than the number of cases – orders of magnitude larger – than the true fatality rate is much lower as well,” the doctors write.

 

The numbers the doctors use to extrapolate their case come from Wuhan, the northeastern Italian town of Vò, and the NBA. According to their calculations, the prevalence rate of the coronavirus is much higher than the reported numbers in any country imply, and therefore the death rates are lower, relative to population infected.

 

They estimate that the epidemic could result in a national death tally of closer to 20,000-40,000, as opposed to the upper-limit estimates of several million, and a fatality rate of 0.01%.

 

“If we’re right about the limited scale of the epidemic, then measured focused on older populations and hospitals are sensible," conclude Bendavid and Bhattacharya. "A universal quarantine may not be worth the costs it imposes on the economy, community and individual mental and physical health.”

 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/stanford-doctors-coronavirus-fatality-rate-may-be-far-lower-current

Anonymous ID: 792bab March 26, 2020, 1:05 p.m. No.8575597   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5609

>>8575048

 

What Causes Sanpaku Eyes?

 

Sanpaku describes eyes in which the sclera—the white part—can be seen above or (usually) below the iris. The word is Japanese, from elements meaning “three” and “white,” the idea being that the iris is bounded by sclera on three sides, rather than the usual two.

 

https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/columns/straight-dope/article/13047713/what-causes-sanpaku-eyes-and-what-the-hell-are-sanpaku

Anonymous ID: 792bab March 26, 2020, 1:06 p.m. No.8575609   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5625

>>8575597

His list of prominent people with sanpaku included John F. and Robert Kennedy, Hitler, Abraham Lincoln, and Marilyn Monroe. And to the extent anyone’s aware of the trait today, it’s because they’ve heard this roster of unfortunates, which has since been expanded to include John Lennon and Elvis. Then there’s Charles Manson, who had the dreaded “upper sanpaku,” in which the white is visible above the iris—thought to indicate a dangerous psychopath. Clearly this group had its share of high-profile troubles, one concedes, but not ones that could have been foretold from the visibility of their sclera.

Anonymous ID: 792bab March 26, 2020, 1:08 p.m. No.8575625   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5674

>>8575609

Or could they? Several sources on sanpaku point with satisfaction to an August 1963 interview (by Tom Wolfe, no less) of George Ohsawa in the New York Herald Tribune, in which he’s said to have predicted JFK’s death. Online Herald Tribune archives, though, stop in the year 1962, leading one to wonder: Just how high up does this thing go, anyway? What are they hiding?