This so reminds me of Esther chapter 9. The enemies. On the day that the bad guys had expected to win, the good guys won, and then the King granted them another day of killing so that the good guys could wipe out even more of their enemies.
Single-colour twitter banners alternative hypotheses
A few days ago the background images in celebrity twitter banners suddenly began being replaced by solid-colour backgrounds. Anons proposed that these colours indicate their legal status in some way in relation to the storm, pedophile arrests, etc. I like that theory. I also think it is correct. But it is far from proven.
Here is an alternative theory: There have always been random solid-colour backgrounds behind all images in twitter. In a recent update to the twitter system the programmers inadvertently caused only banner background images of a particular file type to be displayed. All banner background images of other filetypes ceased being displayed, so that instead the usually-invisible randomly-allocated background colour is being displayed instead.
I searched for the top celebrity twitter accounts, and the web said "Jimmy Fallon". On going to his twitter page I noticed that for a fraction of a second, solid-colour backgrounds appeared behind the images before the images themselves appeared. See sequential screenshots 1, 2 and 3 below, all taken within half a second of the webpage starting to load (I reloaded the page several times, and clicked until I managed to capture the backgrounds as his twitter page was loading in my browser.)
The first few times I refreshed the page, the banner background was maroon. But for the last few refreshes the banner background colour was dark bluey-grey.
Two Experiments to determine which theory is correct:
-
Choose a celebrity with a solid-colour twitter banner background and refresh their twitter page 10 or 20 times to see if it changes colour.If it does, then the colours are probably not an indicator of their storm status.
-
Using your own twitter account, make copies of your banner image in several different file formats - jpg, gif, png, tif - and upload each one in turn, do a refresh, and see if it displays. If some formats are not displayed and the background colour displayed instead, then to me that would disprove the storm-status theory.
>The first few times I refreshed the page, the banner background was maroon.
Apologies—that was Selena Gomez’s twitter banner with the maroon background, not Jimmy Fallon's.
>chatter online that this is due to auto censorship settings removing the pics they have chosen as a banner
>>07782e
>No…it's the scumbags at twaddle. They made a new policy - I think yesterday…day before…to "blank out" all home page banners unless one is logged in.
>Why they are doing it, of course, is because - to which you allude - Gen. Flynn and others use it for comms and the poor babies on the evil side are losing so badly they just start grasping at straws, anything to try and stop what is coming.