>>8646472

High IQ post

Anon, you are spot on. Thanks for saying what not only needed to be said, but needs to be repeated and hammered home. Especially these two points (corrected typos, hope you don't mind):

the other platform people need to absolutely chill on some speculation or make it 100% understood that "at this point is only speculation based on questionable related events" or some shit.

Normie platformer influencers on here that spew speculation as fact and not "suggestion" or "hypotheses" to their boomer fanbase that's spreads ad infinitum need personal accountability and need us that use said platforms to hold them accountable every single time to make sure of it.

>>8646471

It makes sense to me because I believe that group spends more time on social media than conservatives.

>>8646561

> Something like that needs to be put in every bread imo.

I agree again. Try to get some rest, Anon. I think all of us here have disrupted sleep patterns. It sucks, but it is what it is. When I've spent too many sleepless nights, I'll take an OTC sleep aid for a couple of nights, and it helps some.

>>8646560

Not trying to silence anyone. Not at all. But we're on here 24/7 blasting MSM because they "report" their biases and opinions rather than fact. We should call out social media influencers when they do the same spouting off their theories as actual Q facts.

>>8646583

Because that is it's mission.

https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=112508

>>8646619

Of course theories are great, when they are stated as such. That's the point. Too many posts don't carry the disclaimer that it's a theory, and many people only read those and not actual Q drops. Then Q as a whole gets blown off, and no one believes any of it. They don't get that the movement is actually to encourage people to research for themselves. Too many will never do that, and will always rely on someone else's information.

>>8646723

NO, that is not what is showing.

>>8646749

FWIW, it was the 5th article down when I googled the same search phrase.

>>8646785

>Something has definitely changed with the search function, i think we can say that with 100% certainty by this point.

I definitely agree with you on that point.