>>8695280

Everyone should be questioning things at least a little bit right now. In fact, I argue that nobody should have ever been 100% on board with Q, particularly after he told you up front that he was going to lie to you during this process (disinformation).

What's wrong with being a little skeptical and requiring empirical evidence of said actions? Nothing. And it doesn't make one a shill.

>>8695506

Next week? What about last week? That was supposed to be horrible, but what do you know…it wasn't. Now it's next week. How are they going to manufacture all the deaths? Will it just be numbers that nobody can verify, or will they steal from the regular flu deaths and maybe throw in a few cancer deaths as well? All bullshit.