Anonymous ID: 8a3fc5 April 7, 2020, 8:54 a.m. No.8713598   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8713570

I appreciate your point of view. The question is not about Austin, it's about the FBI.

 

I was trying not to equate this Guy to anyone else, but because you brought it up a couple of other names come to mind.

 

Flynn

Carter Page

Trump

 

Thanks for taking time to listen, not.

Anonymous ID: 8a3fc5 April 7, 2020, 9:16 a.m. No.8713729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4021

>>8713651

So in this case FBI = White Hats

Let's defend the FBI on this one.

Don't bother listening to testimony to the contrary.

Let's forget about Roger Stone and Process Crimes.

Don't take into consideration blackmail techniques of threatening family members, costly legal procedures, and the fact that they will do this to anyone, (including the POTUS)!

 

>>8713570

please respond to this post with uninformed, hateful emotion and slander.

Anonymous ID: 8a3fc5 April 7, 2020, 9:53 a.m. No.8714003   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4152

>>8713584

Can we say Gaslight?

So the FBI pulls a “Roger Stone” on Steinbart. What can we deduce?

 

1) Steinbart is a threat to society:

Currently on house arrest and grounded from the internet.

Charged with extorting Datto (charge not yet filed) for an archive that he has paid for.

2) Intimidation and harassment:

Steinbart is somehow a threat that needs to be silenced.

We’ve seen this type of over-reaction before.

Individual rights and due process is a joke in this corrupt system.

3) There is nothing to this, Austin is a LARP!

It’s all made up. The FBI didn’t toss his house in full battle rattle.

They didn’t lock him up in a 3X3 cell for three days without food.

They didn’t seize all his computers and internet devices.

None of this happened because you wouldn’t do this to a no nothing nobody.