Rainman and crew(Bakers union) attack bakers and gaslight bakers that they don't want to bake, gaslight them and try to insinuate they are the bakers when they bake under guest pastebins. Rusty is Rainman, he teaches the baking class and uses a name/trip on /comms/ and he and his crew attack bakers that are not discord trannies with them. They use the rainman persona to get anons to ignore anyone that calls out baker gate keeping of valuable information in notables. It's actually pretty brilliant and has a 2-fold benefit, use rainman screaming to gaslight/harrass bakers not part of your crew to newfags and get anons to ignore anyone that speaks up when bakers gatekeep information due to rainmans constant sperging. Now we know why rainman shows up and attacks only certain bakers, it's the bakers Rusty and crew don't want baking.

The only way for anons to stop Comped bakers is for anons to learn to bake

I started baking because was tired of bakers leaving out good diggs with no explained reasoning, and generally responding with smart ass responses when questioned. The biggest and most effective way to stop the flow of information is to gain control of the baking, anons have to take back control.

>inb4 10 "anons" jump on me and ignore the evidence that's been presented and attack the messenger

http://archive.is/VbkEm #7

http://archive.is/BlG3N #8

1. Rainman gaslighting graphic used to attack baker

1. Rusty admitting he was the person in the bread that rainman was attacking me in posting my pastebin account with no answer as to why

1. Rusty claiming to have posted my pastebin account just cause he wanted people to know I was baking.

1. Rusty in a separate bread piling on with rainman while I was baking

5 Rusty admitting he had no reason to post my pastebin account in bread for rainman to use to try to gaslight me as a bad baker.

>>8736092

1. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

>>8736168

>ba09b8

1. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

>>8736230

1. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

>>8736367

How do we take back our Country decoding message and intel when intel is being left out due to bakers refusing to add info to notables to be found later?

1. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

>>8736371

>>8736371

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/04/09/cbs-news-caught-broadcasting-fake-hospital-footage-second-time/

>>8736432

please see my reponse >>>/comms/>>9770

>>8736367

>>8736415

>>8736518

>>8736432

>>8736658

>>8736658

>Who is in the so-called baker's union?

>name the bakers and show the evidence or stop posting this nonsense

Denying the evidence isn't working

The only person I am speaking on that I have direct evidence of doing it is Rusty by his own admission

1. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

1. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

1. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

>>8736748

I am a baker, what I want an answer to is why other bakers (Rusty) would be attacking a baker and making a post for Rainman to use to create a graphic with, and not only create a graphic but a graphic showing an incomplete picture used to gaslight someone volunteering their time to help the board.

1. Why post my pastebin name?

2. When has Rusty ever posted another bakers pastebin name previous to this event?

3. Why are other Bakers jumping in to defend Rusty's actions? I didn't post his pastebin account to be used in a graphic to gaslight him, yet I am the one the other Bakers are piling on.

4. Why is Rusty attacking bakers by his own admission in a busy bread along with Rainman

5. Why does Rainman only attack certain bakers directly

Answer these and the subject dies.

>>8736874

>1. Why post my pastebin name?

>

>2. When has Rusty ever posted another bakers pastebin name previous to this event?

>

>3. Why are other Bakers jumping in to defend Rusty's actions? I didn't post his pastebin account to be used in a graphic to gaslight him, yet I am the one the other Bakers are piling on.

>

>4. Why is Rusty attacking bakers by his own admission in a busy bread along with Rainman

>

>5. Why does Rainman only attack certain bakers directly

>>8736891

lodge spelling complaints to the author of

https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm