>>8751062

great job

1- wonder if this is where rico comes in indicting the entire orgs, families?

2- from the JS grand jury update re. durham, i think dc was mentioned? do we have a homerun case/unbiased jury pool or another reason assuming dc is accurate. or maybe needed because most are foreigners, does it have to be in jurisdiction of our federal corp/gov. dc?

3- will GJ be looking at evidence, etc? I thought a us prosecutor could just bring charges, whats the deal with the GJ, certain offenses at high levels like treason?

>>8751783

also boomerang theory/action

fauci wants double blind studies on HCQ i think, vaccines don't undergo proper unbiased testing based on what i believe so looking into the vaccine scam by evaluation the approval studies could lead to alot of fuckery implicating moar people.