>>8769332
>here are the autists who call you a shill if you ask them why they parse the number of periods in a tweet, calling you a shill because you point out a literal contradiction.
False prophets, don't take them seriously when they proclaim themselves to "know things" because of how many spaces divided by two plus five dashes equals whoa man 17!
>and I suggest that Q avoid philosophy and stick to spy thriller narratives.
We've put our trust in the "experts" to keep us safe, and the "experts" abuse that trust to keep us caged and sick. The jaded will say "That's just how it is." I call it evil. This is more than just a spy thriller at this point.
>It almost seems, after last night's drops, that Qanon has indeed reached cult status, which of course will be its achilles heel.
It isn't and never has been a cult, although people are free to depict it as whatever they feel. As am I. Don't take my word for it.
>Meantime, those who cling to God will cling to God, and those who don't will cling to idols.
>That's a useful function of this whole thing, too, perhaps.
What, keeping people distracted from truth? If you think people "cling" to God in the same way they cling to idols, you're missing the point. Idols are fallible. God is not. Cut out the middleman who wants to color the raw truth to fit their own ends. Go directly to God.