Which statement is more true?
1) Money → Power → Control
or
2) Money → Control → Power
I'm not sure.
Are they too much the same?
I was thinking that one has to have power first before they can have control.
And that they need to have the money before they have the power.
Like in follow the money. Then the money leads to power which leads to control.
Or should it be the other way around.
Control leads to Power?
Maybe it should just be
Money → Power/Control