Anonymous ID: 7dd363 April 12, 2020, 9:25 p.m. No.8775520   🗄️.is 🔗kun

LMWHY

 

POTUS tweet caps

Lunar Module WHY

April 11, 1970

 

https://action.scholastic.com/issues/2017-18/020118/disaster-in-space.html

 

pic related

Anonymous ID: 7dd363 April 12, 2020, 10:04 p.m. No.8775771   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5795 >>5804

>>8775613

Graham: Isn’t there also a long settled law that goes back to the Eisentrager case (I can’t remember the name of it)….

 

Kavanaugh: Johnson v. Eisentrager.

 

Graham: Right, that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy are considered enemy combatants?

 

Kavanaugh: They can be, they’re often, sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military.

 

Graham: Let’s talk about can be. I think there’s a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military, is that correct?

 

Kavanaugh: That is correct.

 

Graham: I think a couple of them were executed.

 

Kavanaugh: Yeah.

 

Graham: So, if anybody doubts there’s a longstanding history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don’t have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and collaborate with the enemy of the nation. You’ll be treated differently. What’s the name of the case, if you can recall, that reaffirmed the concept that you can hold one of our own as an enemy combatant if they were engaged in terrorist activities in Afghanistan. Are you familiar with that case?

 

Kavanaugh: Yes, Hamdi [v. Rumsfeld].

 

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/sen-lindsey-grahams-curious-questions-to-judge-kavanaugh-on-military-tribunals-for-u-s-citizens