Anonymous ID: e2528c April 13, 2020, 12:33 p.m. No.8779616   🗄️.is 🔗kun

THE POLLSTERS GOT IT WRONG WHEN TRUMP TOOK

ON HILLARY IN 2016. CAN YOU TRUST THEM THIS

TIME?

4/13/20 AT 6:00 AM EDT

 

"It's poll season!

 

Over the next eight months we'll see hundreds of horse-race polls between President Donald Trump and presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden. Here's a tip. Don't pay too much attention. The big miss we saw in 2016 can happen again—the coronavirus pandemic could make this election more unpredictable—and there's only so much pollsters can do about it.

 

Leading up to the last election, President Trump dismissed polls unfavorable to him as fake news. He was right. Polls missed big in 2016. Pollsters believe they know what went wrong and have fixed it. After the 2018 midterm elections, the industry declared victory when pundits using polling data called most races correctly. Harry Enten of CNN trumpeted, "2018 was a very good year for polls." Really? Many of the contests were in deep red or blue areas where the outcome was never in doubt. And there were still some big misses. Polls again underestimated Republicans in a handful of states including Florida and, as in 2016, those misses were enough to result in narrow wins in important races. In all, only 80 percent of polls showed the eventual winners leading. That sounds good, but take out the no-brainers, and the hit rate is more like 50–50—in other words, a coin flip.

 

So far in 2020, poll performance is mixed. Polls missed in South Carolina. They said Biden was ahead by an average of 15 percentage points and he won by 28 percentage points, although perhaps that's understandable given the rapid consolidation as other candidates dropped out and the huge endorsement from Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, the third-ranking Democrat in the House. Polls also missed the rise of moderates and fall of progressives, first evident in New Hampshire. Polls were close in Florida, but underestimated Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary in Michigan, as they did in 2016.

 

Those who make forecasts have also missed. Less than a month ago FiveThirtyEight, which focuses on statistical analysis of politics and other key issues, said that Sanders was in "the driver's seat" and "easily most likely to win the Democratic nomination." So much for that.

 

The first signs that something was screwy in 2016 occurred during the primaries, when New York Senator Hillary Clinton, who led the polls in Michigan by an average of 21 points according to RealClearPolitics, lost to Bernie Sanders by a point and a half. It's been called one of the biggest misses in polling history."

 

More:

https://www.newsweek.com/pollsters-got-it-wrong-when-trump-took-hillary-2016-can-you-trust-them-this-time-1497088

Anonymous ID: e2528c April 13, 2020, 12:51 p.m. No.8779732   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9893 >>9913 >>9937

Trump Didn’t Like Azar’s Warnings. So He Disappeared Him

Published Apr. 13, 2020 4:06AM ET

 

“He’s happy to suck up to the president once in a while, but he’s not going to change data or tell lies for anybody.

 

The more we learn about what went on behind the scenes during the critical early days of the coronavirus pandemic, the more Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar had emerged as a rare and unlikely hero pushing the White House for an early response.

 

Speaking truth to power has its price in the Trump administration. The former Eli Lilly executive was shouted down by White House aides as “alarmist” and sidelined by Jared Kushner, Mike Pence and others willing to give the president a more rosy view. And on Sunday night, Trump lashed out at Azar by name for the first time, following a New York Times report that Azar had “directly warned Mr. Trump of the possibility of a pandemic during a call on Jan. 30, the second warning he delivered to the president about the virus in two weeks.”"

 

more:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-didnt-like-alex-azars-warnings-so-he-disappeared-him?ref=home