>>8886638 (lb)

Right; but, so, think about that a sec.

If Q is "flipping the script" on their heads, that's really going to do a number on eschatologists, and arm-chair observers of eschatological theories. Again, I'm wondering if Q is doing it as symbolically as possible to give the illusion, or purposefully to expose a fraud. Know what I'm saying? I understand it's a question not many want to ponder, but it grates at this anon. I've brought this up before, and asked, but still haven't gotten even a small response that seems satisfactory.

>Waves at Q questioningly.

>>8886682

>Don't ask questions and just accept what will happen

No, that's not how this works. Putting absolute authority in some texts, many of which have dubious authenticity, is also an extremely irresponsible thing to do. Not saying the whole thing is bad or good, or is or is not God-inspired. Wondering if there are some consequences to misinterpretations, and responses like yours drive the question even harder.