>>8932848 (lb)

>>8932866 (lb)

>Worst TORCH statues ever

According to some architectural document

"Historic structures report: old north church, architectural data, Boston national historical park"

these might be urns (pics relate, pages 88 & 89 of the pdf)

Not an architecture specialist, and don't know if these could be urns, but the doc seems to say so.

Spire of that church was blown off twice as well and has been rebuilt two or three times (page 76 in the pdf, last pic)

https://archive.org/download/historicstructur00unit_0/historicstructur00unit_0.pdf

>>8933033

>>8933050

All great points. None interest me, so thanks for nothing.

Was interested in the "torches" and tried to clear that up.

thanks again.

>>8933149

>Not sure what point is being missed

Your "arguments" come without any sauce.

I provided an architectural document describing the "torches" as urns and the snapshots from the document I posted clearly describe the outside of the building, specifically the outside of the spire/tower.

You can tell me all day long they are torches, the pdf about the building describes them as urns.

So unless you provide sauce describing these structures as "torches", your opinion doesn't matter to me or the matter in question.