>>8961529 (lb)

>As the good book says, only a fool says in his heart, "There is no God"

Authenticity of many of those books is still in question. Ever think that Q might be quoting it ironically? I mean, Jesus sure did do a number on the old laws and their lawyers, didn't He? Then, they sacrificed him. Like their religion demanded.

>Think on that a sec.

>Have you ever told a lie?

Yes. Just like David.

>Have you ever stolen anything, in your entire life?

No.

>Have you ever wanted what someone else had?

Yes, but being from a poor background and having had things stolen from me, often, I've always tried to prioritize my actions to work towards earning my own.

>Have you ever wanted a woman married to another man?

No (or at least not that I know of), but I have had adulterous thoughts about women that weren't married. Never acted on it. Unlike others.

>Have you ever called a man a fool? wish he were dead? Prejudiced against anyone?

No. I'm way too foolish, myself, to think of someone else as a fool. I do get frustrated when someone doesn't seem to understand things I'm trying to show them, but I usually blame myself or my approach, and vent frustrations.

Yes. Think Clintons.

Yes; I have been deceived, in the past, just like many have. I'd like to think I've grown way past that, and abandoned that way of thinking, regardless of how I was raised to think of other people.

>Do you see how all of those things cause you to wish there is no universal justice?

Nope; doesn't even equate, actually. If the Bible is even remotely accurate, we're going to face some judgements and then we get some peace for a while, then they are going to let Satan out, again, for some reason, then everything gets obliterated, and we start anew, again.

Seems like a lot of unnecessary steps to reunification to God, in the end, but whatever. I don't make the rules, I just do my best to play by them.

>>8961731

The standard answer is big investors drive markets using computers that make predictions based on market conditions that fluctuate. Not to mention the 10s of thousand of well versed (and not so well versed) FOREX traders, across the globe, hedging bets on currencies in a game they don't understand.

The "Q" answer would be "top of the pyramid/Roths/Soros/Cabal".

>>8961755

>>8961777

>>8961782

Simple question for you anons. If Patriots are in control, then why would they go out of their way to allow Revelation to happen? Lots of people dying/suffering when it's not necessary. So, again, what's the purpose of allowing it to happen?

Still haven't received a satisfactory answer to this, and not a single anon can seem to even come close to touching it with any semblance of logic/reason. Let's face it, if Q "wins", Revelation is "cancelled". Did anyone get what I meant with the "Socrates" post in LB?

>>8960936

>>8961868

Then why are we here, anon.

>>8961881

So seem so certain. How is that, exactly? Many anons, at some point, were certain:

1. Churches get you close to God

2. Disney World was the vision of a man that wanted to create the most incredible family destination

3. JFK was shot by a single person (well, maybe you didn't buy this one)

4. CIA ended mockingbird long ago

5. The flu was a naturally occurring thing that sprung up around the late 1800s early 1900s

6. Vaccines prevent disease (some do, you know)

7. HIV came from a guy that boinked a monkey

8. The civil war was fought over slavery

9. Actors and Actresses were not all pedos or people that knew about and possibly covered for pedos

10. Snopes is good at getting to the truth

11. COVID-19 is worse than the yearly flu (can't blame you, here, actually)

12. Jessica Alba was part African American

13. Hugh Hefner was simply a dude that liked tits and ass, and totally not a honeypot operative for the CIA/MOS

All of these things are wrong (except some of #6). All of them. What else are we wrong about?

>>8961888

Q has stated, repeatedly, the end won't be for everyone. Let me ask you something. What's the point in making the distinction here?

>Does Satan exist?

>Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Answering "Yes" to both does NOT make any sense. Q doesn't work on "belief", Q works on facts/truth. The answer to 2 is "Yes". That should be very obvious, at this point, as there are many that worship him. Many more than ever should, actually. They use symbolism and worship Satan because they are "Stupid". How mind crushing would it be to realize that it's actually always been up to us to fix the problems of the world? What if the answer to #1 is "No."

That, right there, would put 99% of the world in a hurt locker, after learning who's been ruling over them.

Next question:

If a very large majority of your base identify as "Christian" or "God fearing", what benefit would you have in alienating that base, further, with revealing some truths they weren't ready for?

>No.

>Highest classification.

>Consider the vastness of space.

UFOs are a distraction, but we aren't alone. The Bible mentions exactly nothing of these things, yet, we're trusting Q is giving us more truth than we've ever uncovered on our own.

I really hate to even go here, but what if we're looking at some really hard truths, later on, after justice has been served, and we're left contemplating the reason God left it up to us to take the trash out? After we are living in a "Beautiful Brave New World" post Justice, of course, what then? Idealistically, we won't have problems with future elections (Q said so), and corruption from all governments should be mostly (if not completely) routed out.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0836cc No.4280247 📁

Dec 12 2018 18:43:49 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 074619 No.4280228 📁

Dec 12 2018 18:43:32 (EST)

>>4280189

Is there a plan in place for AFTER trump?

>>4280228

Yes.

Q

Benjamin Franklin summarized his viewpoint on God, 6 weeks before his death. Prior to this, he was well known for constantly questioning the Church, and whether or not society would be better off without it. He essentially said that "religion", in general, is worthless unless it served to instruct people on how to be better to their fellow man. If this isn't absolute truth to every anon, by now, then I have no idea what is.

Quoting Franklin:

"Here is my Creed. I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by His Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we render to him, is doing Good to his other Children. That the Soul of Man is immortal, and will be treated with Justice in another Life respecting its Conduct in this … As for Jesus of Nazareth … I think the system of Morals and Religion as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw … but I have … some Doubts to his Divinity; though' it is a Question I do not dogmatism upon, having never studied it, and think it is needless to busy myself with it now, where I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble."

Now, sit back and ask yourself a question. Why is Q using the Socratic method? Did you know that some people believe Socrates may have never even existed? We've plenty of writings to suggest we know all about the mind/thoughts of Socrates, but veritable proof of his existence is, well, "thin". Who else do we know that's like that?