Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:25 a.m. No.8962476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2539 >>2558

>>8962460

>One thing I thought was strange in his defense against censorship, "they're only words."

hm, now that's interesting…

been aware of the pied-piper/counterculture cred part, but this suggests another angle to the psyop, helping enforce the "nothing to see here" narrative that magic isn't real and there aren't working spells cast all around all the time…

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:34 a.m. No.8962531   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2561 >>2564

>>8962516

>>8962493

>>censorship is the antithesis of creativity

not so simple: having constraints/limits to art is a creation multiplier.

being completely free often just leads to variations of "blank page vertigo" syndrome.

 

(obviously not advocating for censorship tho)

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:36 a.m. No.8962545   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8962532

yup.

speaking of the Vegas event, that would be an interesting case study.

i remember very well small youtubers who had amazing digs and finds.

sometimes AJ would get to that a week later, then quickly sell his owns yarns.

meanwhile small youtuber banned, end of dig

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:39 a.m. No.8962563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2885

>>8962539

>'Another angle to the psyop' is just more ordo ab chao.

just find it illuminating as an applied example.

we know they use the stars to shepherd, but how/to do what exactly?

what's the interest in having hero Frank use this public tribune to sell the idea that it's only words and those can never hurt anyone at all? while in part true, as in "sticks and stones…", that's damn convenient for people who live and breathe that very science

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:43 a.m. No.8962592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2623

>>8962561

>would not go so far as to consider censorship's primary effect (…)

never said primary, but it's far from black&white…

 

to push it to its extreme: if you're free to create anything and it doesn't have to have any meaning whatsover, why bother? it undercuts the very drive to manifest anything.

but if has to accomplish at least one thing, then focus and intent has something to build on

 

>>8962564

>supply and demand versus the marketing genius of the 'Pet Rock.'

not following…

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:45 a.m. No.8962604   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2648

>>8962595

>I also point to his very poor commercial success as counterpoint

you have GOT to be kidding.

he had major label backing, TV appearances US & worldwide, a fkn movie deal for Motels, and on and on and on…

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 10:53 a.m. No.8962674   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8962648

pointless whataboutism on another agent for another part of the market.

that you even compare Zappa & Morrison (both yugely marketed superstars) goes against your attempted argument

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 11:06 a.m. No.8962769   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8962760

>So…simply because it is what the globalist scum want, NEVER use the con-phrase "social" distancing.

dayum, epiphany.

never saw it like that, but can't unsee.

why the fuck say "social"?

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 11:10 a.m. No.8962821   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2864

>>8962798

>Is that why they’re FF always seem to be a cluster-fucking failure?

meh

it's also a lot more traumatizing for those who see through the bullshit, it's a flaunt: "see, we don't even have to be competent at it, they buy it anyway"

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 11:19 a.m. No.8962894   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8962864

> the taunting aspect

lived it, seeing one flimsy FF after the other go by.

adds a whole other level of depression to see they're not even bothering putting real effort into hiding it

Anonymous ID: 4ff087 April 29, 2020, 11:34 a.m. No.8962998   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3094

>>8962979

>What the hell is this? Is this some nonsense to get people to think that they can just join the Illuminati?

well they've been pimping that shit since the nineties, where you been?

the ILLUMINATI™ op has brought fresh framing & narrative control for years