>>8963894 (pb) Q Post

>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/edit

Opinion

Historical controls are used in many previous studies in medicine. In this respect, the safety of Hydroxychloroquine is well documented. When the safe use of this drug is projected against its apparent effect of decreasing the progression of early cases to ventilator use, it is difficult to understand the reluctance of the authorities in charge of U.S. pandemic management to recommend its use in early COVID-19 cases. The effects of the chloroquines were first outlined 15 years ago by the CDC’s own Special Pathogens Unit.

>>8963894

The virus is real and real bad for the very sick. But, is it bad for anyone else? It does not appear to be, so why the over reaction?

>>8964002

>>8963984

>>8964012

>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/edit

Copy for Baker

Wait to you see who he really is….lmao……oh, sorry sir, it was a joke! >>8964021

>>8964250

#2929

Typo in Previous Drop

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

3 Mar 2019 - 6:02:09 AM

Spygate: They Were Spying on Trump Before He Announced His Candidacy on June 16, 2015

2926

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

3 Mar 2019 - 5:48:26 AM

>>5476615

Physical landscape +/- 'proves' it could not have been taken pre_2016.

OP active pre_announcement.

Intel awareness pre_2016.

Q

>5476642

Correction:

Could not have been taken post_2016.

Think 2015.

Long day.

Q

>>8964418

30 Months ago!!

Bit slow shill

>>8964467

In all honesty, it is very difficult for new concepts to be adopted by the medical community for routine clinical use. There are many reasons and many barriers.

>>8964528

>>8964587

See

>>8964461

>>8964565

>>8964258

Retraction

>>8964461

>>8964215

I would like this to be the reason. I would be good for the public to lose trust in vaccines imo. If there is something good there it should try to regain our trust through facts.

But what kind of tech?