Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 6:57 p.m. No.8967866   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8005

>>8967847

Now understand Maritime Law and what you've said starts to really come full circle.

You're dead on, anon.

 

I'm glad Q finally stepped in to help us explain these things. This would have been significantly more unorganized without them.

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:05 p.m. No.8967958   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7981 >>8023

>>8967918

It's sort of funny when people assume that Jim and Ron have no clue about what's going on with this boardโ€ฆ

 

>>8967924

Yeah, you're right. Penny the Mouse is just fake, anyway, right?

I mean, Mickey Mouse symbolism totally doesn't mean anything.

No one should think about how the rat hole totally doesn't translate to underground tunnels and no one should look in to Egyptian Mythology about the Rat and Mouse.

Those Mouse statues for "science" totally don't mean anything, either.

Thanks for making sure we don't do anything irrational.

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:10 p.m. No.8968007   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8020 >>8069 >>8074

>>8967973

The shills are actually helpful for a variety of reasons:

They keep us motivated

They keep us on subjects that we otherwise would have overlooked by attempting to "correct us"

They show us what they regard as important based on what they attack

They help us identify rat lines and how they function

They help us prove veracity by identifying when we're over the target

They help us understand how [they] use communication systems

They help us erect plausible deniability

They unwittingly support capitalism

They keep us company

They make us laugh

 

They're super helpful!

Thanks shills!

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:12 p.m. No.8968034   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8180

>>8967987

Why are you so obsessed with ego?

Have you still not understood Yaldabaoth and its aims?

 

Some of us understand why we were put through digital bootcamp, you'll find.

When you do, how will you explain your incessant invocation of ego?

 

Q isn't defining themselves and instead use it as an operational information dispersion vector. You, on the other hand, pat yourselves on the back and flaunt your credibility among people that don't bother with your intellectual immaturity.

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:18 p.m. No.8968056   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8968010

Anyone who comes here and invokes ego isn't worth your time.

The only people deserving of your attention are people applying efforts in an honest and transparent manner.

Hell, I gatekeep plenty of knowledge (for various reasons) and even I know I'm an asshole.

Despite my hypocrisy in this regard, I feel overwhelmed with obligation to help this place continue it social system wherein anyone who deviates from the hivemind is immediately singled out and socialized back in to place. It keeps things running smoothly here.

Besides, I'm more than willing to help people if they show effort.

 

Don't get me wrong, I won't be too rigid. I simultaneously recognize thier usefulness and enjoy their coming here. I just see no reason to abandon all precedent just because someone other than Q is helpful for once.

 

Now, are you done acting like a pouty little pubescent yet, or should I just go back to ignoring you?

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:20 p.m. No.8968086   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8968010

Anyone who comes here and invokes ego isn't worth your time.

The only people deserving of your attention are people applying efforts in an honest and transparent manner.

Hell, I gatekeep plenty of knowledge (for various reasons) and even I know I'm an asshole.

Despite my hypocrisy in this regard, I feel overwhelmed with obligation to help this place continue it social system wherein anyone who deviates from the hivemind is immediately singled out and socialized back in to place. It keeps things running smoothly here.

Besides, I'm more than willing to help people if they show effort.

 

Don't get me wrong, I won't be too rigid. I simultaneously recognize thier usefulness and enjoy their coming here. I just see no reason to abandon all precedent just because someone other than Q is helpful for once.

 

Now, are you done acting like a pouty little pubescent yet, or should I just go back to ignoring you?

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:25 p.m. No.8968138   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8158

>>8968069

I guess you reap what you sow, but I'll be honest anon, I don't really get what you're saying or why it's important.

 

>>8968074

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

 

Yeah, I dunno, boys, maybe I'm stroking out or can't comprehend anything all of a sudden, but you both have lost me.

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.8968156   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8237 >>8287

>>8968100

Yes, there are people who come here solely to secure the confines of discourse.

The people that shout you down and ensure you don't talk about specific things are easy to observe and ignore. The ones that are more sophisticated, who encourage you to do worthless shit, though, tend to be just a little more potent.

It gets much easier to define them once you've lurked enough.

 

Welcome, anon. Make yourself at home.

Anonymous ID: d8fb0e April 29, 2020, 7:38 p.m. No.8968265   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8472

>>8968194

So, the anon you're responding to is a brainlet.

Osiris isn't Lucy.

Lucy is closer to Thoth if we're talking Egyptians.

Instead, Osiris is the Father aspect of Egyptians reiterative Triumvirate dynamic. Horus is the Son (Sun) aspect and Isis is the Mother (Feminine) aspect.

 

People that conflate the Sun with Osiris don't know who or what Ra was. People that purposefully misdirect you from learning about Saturn or any of its iterations, be it El, Anu, Yahweh or whatever else are always doing it on purpose.

Finally, people that can't explain that Lucy is a feminine aspect and also means the planet Venus are always setting out to confuse you.

 

The majority of the Game, at least in the first few levels, is about comprehending what [they] believe and how it translates to actionable info.

One should always be unsure of anyone that seem so confident about their beliefs, even if that means you questioning me. Where myself and the other anon likely differ, however, is I can actually explain these things and I'm not going to rely on pretend socratic methods to fill in the gaps of what I don't adequately understand.