>belief
Exactly my point, anon. Exactly my point.
You're still working under the assumption he didn't know precisely what was going on.
No, reverse that. My point is there is a widely held belief that God gave man free will. It's a belief that has no evidence to support its claim.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/belief?s=t
It's quite the conundrum. I assert that free will is innate. The reason I say this is it's literally a concept of the mind's creation and/or understanding. Had you no knowledge of God from birth, would you "do as you needed to" in order to provide yourself with food, clothing shelter, etc? Sure. You'd exercise free will; something you are born with. In this example, you don't know about free will because "God told you". You know about free will because you used it, daily. It's innate. The fact that it's innate doesn't prove that it's a gift from God.
This is what people are missing. We often attribute things to people/places erroneously. We do it, most often, with God.
>He should still go to jail for lying.
It has to be thrown out because it was a trap. This supersedes the lying. If justice were to lift the blinder for a sec, they'd realize that Flynn set them up instead, and turn around and arrest the fuck out of the conspirators.
You're not very good at this.
>However, we needed Flynn's discovery process to uncover other info
Which should tell you Wray's on the team.
>belief assumed as true.
You keep saying it, and missing it in the same breath. Here's how you define evidence:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/evidence?s=t
noun
that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign: His flushed look was visible evidence of his fever.
Law. data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects.
verb (used with object), ev·i·denced, ev·i·denc·ing.
to make evident or clear; show clearly; manifest: He evidenced his approval by promising his full support.
to support by evidence:
Ask yourself a really simple question. If patriots are in control (they are) then why does the plan have to be that Q maintains anonymity? There's not logical reason for it, and outwards admittance would further/quicken the awakening process so we can get "humanity" back in order.
So, not only do you know all about the nature of God, you know what's in my heart, and how God will choose to judge me?
That's awesome, anon. That's a mighty powerful gift!
First definition is ample:
>that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
Provide evidence that God gave you free will. Then, there may be a reason to believe it's true. The only reason you believe God gave you free will is because you were told by someone that's how it works.
My claim is that free will is innate, and I even provided an example of how it works. You are regurgitating some doctrine that's based on a system of beliefs without evidence to convince me that free will is a gift from God.
That definitely raised a red flag for me, too. It's not like we don't already have NG deployed every-fucking-where. So, take Q's latest drops (insurgency). Then, think about the "deployed NG" drop. Then, think about this repeated statement:
>At some point the streets (for them) will not be safe.
Might be a there, there. Not anons, but them (DS).
>Take them all back, and enforce the first Amendment law on the internet.
I agree with your sentiment and argued this very point years ago, but Q wants IBOR, which would do this WW. That's what you want to look out for.