DRAMA ALERT

1/3

hey anons, this is long and not fun, but since it's about the BAKER KREW i still think you should get a chance to know about it.

just a not-so-amusing episode displaying the Great Baking Powers That Wish They Would Be, and how you'd think the yahoos over at comms have their shit together.

They don't. but NOT ALL: Rusty is a fine man and a fucking SAINT for dealing with these self-inflated blind power-obsessed oblivious cunts.

>>>/comms/***:

well that… escalated. good GOD.

what the HELL are you guys doing?

this is how you responsibly manage change and baking decisions?

by making a scene and going full scorched earth, spending bread after bread screaming at anons, accusing one after the other… look at you bunch of paranoid fucks, this is ridiculous.

way to show you're NOT a bunch of self-proclaimed ruling class, control-freak hypocritical elitist gatekeepers.

let's recap.

2 days ago, on the qr board:

-"ah shit, again problems with the dough. i tried to help them with that many times before, but those curmudgeon baker dick-taters always mess it up back"

-"come to comms, there we can take time to talk and think, that is where we do these things"

-"well ok, i admit i do have apprehensions about the club but i can try i guess"

-"no no it's not a baker club we're not like that anymore those are old rumors"

-"ok so here is a proposed solution to many problems, basically ALL THE SAME INFO just reshuffled around"

-"ALL say it's good, except one who doesn't like it, but won't really say why, because, you know, it's all so tiresome, you know? anyway these things take time, child."

-"ok, ok, fine."

yesterday:

-"…" [crickets]

-"ok. but, um, you know those issues that were why do this in the first place? they're still around, and going to be… why not just go ahead with this one? all the other guys liked it, what's wrong with it now?" * >>>/comms/12083

-"…" [crickets]

-"ok. well, i'll just keep this work pastebin updated so it's ready to go, just in case. Oh, anons are pointing out baker missed a Q drop, there's a deadlink in the globals, wrong caps for a Q drop… is he seeing all this? well i'm seeing so might as well add to the parallel paste. New bread, he saw just one of the fixes needed, here brah you can try this one out. Oh, he took the whole thing, oh well ok. Maybe see if he keeps it for next bread? Oh he does. No anon complaints, but better keep the baker crew updated: guys, it went live…"

-"looking good", "great, all fine until the shills come over to fuck it up"… * >>>/comms/12096 , >>>/comms/12097

and fuck it up they did. because when some controlfreak came over and was outraged, he just flat out reverted to old bread. IMMEDIATELY AND UNILATERALLY.

all while REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEING and kvetching at the fuckers who change the dough… immediately and unilaterally. Irony proof? probably not.

but the thing is, i don't know what dough he took to go back in time, but it messed up way more than just the cosmetics that got him so furious.

WR section reverted back to an older state, the stupid fucking pastebins instead of research threads came back, meme ammo section reverted to an older section…

YEAH, NICE CLEAN UP BRO. WAY TO DEAL WITH A "CRISIS", WHAT GLORIOUS LEADERSHIP YOU ARE DEMONSTRATING.

all the while, now anons are getting pissed off because they don't quite understand what's going on and they see a mad baker putsching the dough.

bakers jump on a narrative that it was an evil plan by evil anons or worse still their mortal enemies the endchans or gerbil or sgrvbl or someone else (look i don't into this namefaggotry. i tolerate it for bakers because they're useful, but holyfuck does this whole episode show WHY anons are so weary of fucking namefags and their lazy asses sat on their deluded thrones of "authority".

IT IS AT THIS POINT IN THE STORY THAT YOU ARE KINDLY INVITED TO NOTICE THAT ALL THE KVETCHING AND COMPLAINING AND REEEEEEING CAMEAFTERTHE BAKERCLUB BARGED IN TO GET THINGS THEIR WAY.

NOTWITH THE INTRODUCTION OF THE REVISED DOUGH.

except for when GMT map anon came in, but that's another story.

i mean seriously, holyfuck:

>>>/comms/12106 , >>>/comms/12120

>graphics anon..

>SHUT THE FUCK UP

>you tactless, impatient piece of ungrateful SHIT.

>leave the ego at the door…I know that's hard to do when you think you have it all figured out and are above anyone else here.Your attitude and demeaning comments at everyone is on display for all to see.

i approve of that message. this is just embarassing. at that point the baker club started going after each other, it was an ugly sight.

but you know what's funny? reducing the redundant GMT part was neither my suggestion nor my work, another baker anon did, and i just went with it because it made sense.

you know, this "collaboration" they speak of…

then all sorts of things happened, haven't seen all of it, especially catching up on QR, but…

>>8999557

…cuntinued. 2/2

>>>/comms/12105

> you didn't discuss these changes with anyone, and took it upon yourself to bake and change it all on your own.

no, i came here to discuss all these changes, AS I WAS ASKED TO DO, and did, and i asked again and again for feedback, and wasn't the one who baked it, and did none of this "on my own"… it was all part of the process.

>Why should one person who no one knows, come in here and change the dough?

because sometimes all it takes to solve a problem is one person?

because i was invited in here to do exactly that?

what the fuck else is this cuntry club for anyway?

also notice this weasely shit: "one person who no one knows"

OF COURSE YOU DON'T KNOW ME. I AM AN ANON. IT'S HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE.

WHAT PART OF THAT IS SO DIFFICULT FOR YOU FUCKS TO UNDERSTAND?

doesn't mean i haven't been along you pretty much all that time, posting and baking, and ebaking as anon.

i just have never, ever, ever tried to build a persona out of it, as you creeps are on about.

it's all about "who is this", "who are you"… who fucking cares? LOOK AT THE WORK. THAT'S WHAT WE ARE HERE FOR.

>>>/comms/12130

>- Removed the 'Newfag' Section which replaced the Research Threads list by someone who didn't discuss the change with anons

but that was already fixed: yet another bug that was a direct result of triggered baker reverting back without even looking at what he was doing.

>>>/comms/12165

>All i wish at the moment is that the bread remains mainly as it was a month ago, before this whole circus began.

bakers being bakers fighting for the STATUS QUO - if not even going back in time.

>bc i baked a LOT of his wonky dough's last Sept/Oct: sgrvl.

>Recognized the format right away

ooooh look at the detective work! baker lives on baker street, what a sherlock.

but no.

unless that's a name YOU've given me, i am not that anon.

>Sgrvl never learned to bake on /qr/; finds it too confusing. Perhaps bc he is confused himself–some kind of schizoid problem, he would admit that himself. Endchan anons know but maybe not everyone here does. Anons there tried to help him but he gets agitated sometimes, that's why he persists and cannot be deterred. Must be handled with unyeilding firmness both for his sake and ours.

geezus, we're into deep psychoanalytics now. just unfortunate that it's all on the wrong person.

then it gets into ever more paranoid territory:

>>>/comms/12168

>This was all a ploy to push anons to ENDchan.

>>>/comms/12172

>It was the point of all of the shilling. Endchan is a honeypot.

just all sorts of wild accusations, completely unrelated to me.

now, are the shills that came in the shitstorm related to Endchan? maybe, i don't know.

but we all saw this coming, the few level-headed bakers there agreed, of course shills might come in and use this to scream.

way to fall DEEP into it, guys.

way to overreact, get angry, get the board angry, and fall back into a position that favors the shills.

>>>/comms/12174

>The positive things about today is that everyone's aware of their infiltration and underhandedness now.

i, um… maybe not the best lesson learned, but ok

>We can all also keep a very close eye on the dough and any changes revert back right away.

you should always keep a close eye. problem is, for a while you've been keeping eyes closed, so there were issues.

>And if they ask for anything to be put in the dough again, we can tell them where to go.

DUDE what did we just say about shills?

this kind of over-reaction is EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT:

-legit anon comes in to help

-is welcomed by Rusty and a few nice bakers

-proceeds to help, shills jump in to confuse things

-REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ANYONE WHO WANTS TO HELP IS EVIL AND MUST BE BANNED

don't you see the problem?

>>8999560

…cuntinued. 3/3

>>>/comms/12177

>still got the country threads unconsolidated

sigh, again with the consolidation. NO. ONE. CLICKS. ON. A. PASTEBIN.

>i think it's just sgrvl, he is not entirely "there" mentally. not a hypothesis. he can be both paranoid and grandiose.

again with the psychiatry and "confirmed" feelz.

>i just confronted him about it on /qr/ not unkindly but i did ask. he says he didn't do it bu t in an unconvincing way, by citing an alibi.

has it not crossed your oblivious mind for a single second that you MIGHT BE WRONG? i was deep asleep then, definitely not me.

>>>/comms/12178

>Feel bad as well b/c yesterday in here I said that practice dough looked gud. Thought it was a student baker legitimately practicing and had formatted the dough how they wanted to practice.

well, yes, sort of.

>>>/comms/12180

>i asked him but he didn't answer although he's still posting on /qr/ right now. he's very easy to peg, so much compulsivity.

no wonder the poor schizo he was confronting was confused.

"very easy to peg", huh? you little detective, you.

>>>/comms/12186

>Well I guess we have to keep our eyes open for that anon who was pushing for dough changes, and any other sneaky additons to the dough.

HELLO

LOOK AT ALL THIS SNEAKY I DONE DID BY BEING INVITED HERE AND FOLLOWING YOUR RULES

>>>/comms/12190

> if Endchan faggots start on bakers again, ever, there’ll be war. Just sayin’.

just flat out stating to the shills how and where to attack them to create yet more fighting and kvetching. sad.

>>>/comms/12195

>> yeah, the shills haven't spoken up yet. IF they do, it was all done out in the open, where people can see it, so… kek.

>So from where I’m sitting, you said that anyone who spoke out about the dough being changed was a shill. Am I mistaken?

these are the great intellects at work baking: "anyone who spoke out"… sigh, no, you pathetic simpleton.

then they start getting mad at each other again

>>>/comms/12197

>Fucking no, I was talking about the endchan people for God's sake.

then they continue being confused by their own theories that aren't theories because they know better

>>>/comms/12198

>Why would the endchan crew complain about the dough being changed when it was them who changed it?

>Why would they change it sneakily and then complain about it?

>Doesn’t make sense.

So these are the bakers, folks.

Just a peek.

Apologies for the shitshow, but looking at the dough now, and gazing upon the fuming remains of this battle, i'm glad it happened.

This accidental kick to the hornet's nest seemed to be badly needed.

It's only unfortunate that many bakers conclusions is to be even more entrenched in their clique and traditions.

I'm not going to pursue the "debating", infighting and drama, you guys are experts at it on your own.

Apologies and congratulations to Rusty, because he was one of the few how was proper and focused on work all along.

there were others, but i haven't followed IDs or names or anything (anon creed you know). You guys really, really rock.

and you are absolute SAINTS to be dealing with this whining, screaming, controlfreak bunch of cunts.

have a lovely day

NOTABLE

>>8999557 , >>8999560 , >>8999564 Update on last night baker drama & BakerKrew tactics

>>8999601

great, then please nominate, because

>>8999605

>yeaaaa…..no

>you don't notable your own posts

just offered the formatting for convenience.

i know it's drama, but anons should have eyes on and make their own mind on it.

>>8999607

admittedly it's a bit more meta, but we're talking bakers and board management.

definitely skip over if not your thing, it's ok

>>8999628

>>8999621

>>8999634

hey at least i'm not deluded like they are.

most anons won't care and that's ok, but even though a shitshow this is important

>>8999651

likewise, cheers! beautiful out here

>>8999645

>It belongs in meta if anywhere.

ok, fair enough.

not looking to keep it going, just want this seen/archived and over.

but friendly warning to baker, i might have to repeat myself…

no worries, the paste is on hand:

on yesterday's Baker drama, only for those interested

>>8999557 , >>8999560 , >>8999564 Update on last night baker drama & BakerKrew tactics

>>>/comms/>>12202, >>>/comms/>>12203, >>>/comms/>>12204 same but on comms board.

>>8999684

>>8999675

>>8999692

yes, but many of bakers spewed out bullshit and lies. just wanted to have a few things corrected.

no action needed, just eyes on for those interested

>>8999716

because despite some very good bakers, a LOT of them are cunts.

sorry to have to point that out.

>>8999720

>And we should trust you arent?

you think for yourself, that's the best part.

you'll notice that's what i'm saying, while they claim their High Baking Authority

>>8999718

>you should look in the mirror anon

indeed, that's one of the problems pointed out in there.

don't worry, storm is passed

but shitty bakers club remains

>>8999825

>but the accusations flew on that shift.

>looking to blame someone

yeah that's just one of the problems.

what's wrong with you guys? supposed to be a tight crew but you turn on yourselves like rabid wolves, such a shame.

>>8999863

i'm with Q team and the anons.

so are some bakers.

but not all

>>8999912

>who is the krew anyways?

i don't know, and i don't care.

as long as they can work with anons, it's fine if they form a club.

but they have a bit of a hard time dealing with power & authority, it's only natural